ArticleScientific reports2025
Spatiotemporal evolution of landscape ecological risk and its driving factors of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei major mineral belt, 1985-2022.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei major mineral belt represents a significant economic development area in China. Effective monitoring and assessment of the regional landscape ecological risk can provide a scientific basis for an ecological protection strategy for the environmental protection of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei major mineral belt. In this study, a landscape ecological risk index was constructed based on land use/land cover, and the spatial and temporal variations of landscape ecological risk were subsequently analyzed. Furthermore, the contribution of the main driving factors of landscape ecological risk was quantified in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei major mineral belt. The results demonstrate that: (1) The land use types within the study area underwent significant changes from 1985 to 2022. The predominant type of transfer was cropland, which was primarily converted to construction land, grassland, and woodland. (2) The landscape ecological risk in central-northern and western parts of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei major mineral belt is higher, while the landscape ecological risk in the southwest parts is lower. Using 2015 as the time point, the landscape ecological risk in the study area was found to change, with the average value of landscape ecological risk for all classes of landscape ecological risk within 2015-2022 being lower than that of 1985-2015, with the exception of the high-risk area. The mean annual landscape ecological risk is obviously higher during the 1985-2015 period in comparison to the 2015-2022 period, with the exception of regions exhibiting high risk. (3) There is a significant positive spatial correlation between landscape ecological risks in different periods. The pattern of landscape ecological risk exhibits both 'high-high' aggregation and 'low-low' aggregation. The 'high-high' aggregations are primarily located in the northern, central and western parts of the study area, while the 'low-low' aggregation zones are mainly located in the southeastern study region. (4) The spatial distribution of landscape ecological risk is predominantly shaped by population density and slope. In the context of interactive factor detection, the positive interaction between slope and average annual temperature, night-time illumination and slope, population density and annual precipitation were identified as exerting a more significant influence on the observed spatial differentiation of landscape ecological risk. It was found that the interaction of multiple drivers had a more pronounced impact on landscape ecological risk than any single factor. The findings of the research project provide a scientific rationale and reference for future land use, resource optimization, landscape ecological risk differential management and ecological restoration. Furthermore, the findings are of considerable importance in terms of maintaining ecological security patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.