Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39827260›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the Visual CARE Measure for assessing children's perceptions of nurses' empathy.

Angelica Wiljén, John Chaplin, Stefan Nilsson, Katarina Karlsson, Joakim Öhlén, Anneli Schwarz

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angelica WiljénInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. angelica.wiljen@gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7463-1628
John ChaplinInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8128-4225
Stefan NilssonInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8847-9559
Katarina KarlssonFaculty of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Borås, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4080-6677
Joakim ÖhlénInstitute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2429-8705
Anneli SchwarzSödra Älvsborgs Hospital, Borås, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1102-3948

Funding

Swedish childhood cancer fund TJ2017-0028, KP2018-0023, MTI2019-0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to translate and validate a questionnaire to be used by children with chronic diseases during procedures. Specific research questions were as follows: Is the translated versions reliable? Is there a correlation between VCM and another questionnaire measuring discomfort to enhance the validity of VCM? The three versions of Visual CARE measure (VCM) were translated following the principles of good practice for translation and cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures, according to the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Cognitive debriefing interviews with children, parents, and healthcare professionals were carried out. The correlation between empathy and discomfort was evaluated using DISCO-RC. The final versions of VCM were administered to children and their parents after a needle procedure or a nasal tube insertion. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 for the 5Q version, 0.93 for the 10Q version, and 0.96 for the 10Q-Parent version, which implies high internal consistency. The intra-class correlation was 0.623 for VCM 5Q, with a mean difference of 1.35 and an ICC of 0.767 for VCM 10Q, with a mean difference of 1.17. This is considered a good agreement between children's and their parents' assessments. A significant difference in the children's reports could be seen when experiencing high discomfort as opposed to low discomfort.

conclusionVCM is a useful Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM) that can help enhance the quality of care for children in a paediatric setting by capturing their perception of the empathy shown. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Parents' by-proxy reports are not always aligned with children's self-reports. In healthcare situations, children can be hurt when they are ignored. • Research shows that empathic encounters relieve distress, improve the relationship between the patient (who could be a child) and carer, and create an open, trusting relationship. WHAT IS NEW: • This study shows that all three versions of the Visual CARE Measure are valid for assessing children's experience of empathy shown by nurses during a procedure.. • This is one of the first studies that confirms the correlation between children's experience of nurses' levels of empathy and the child's discomfort. • This study shows that the Visual CARE Measure can support the evaluation of children's rights with regards to communication in a clinical context.

Indexed as

EmpathyNurse-Patient RelationsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleParentsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenChildChronic diseasesEmpathyPerson-centredQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID39827260
PMCPMC11742902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.