ArticlePediatric research2025
Machine learning models for neurocognitive outcome prediction in preterm born infants.
Article in Pediatric research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOutcome prediction after preterm birth is important for long-term neonatal care, but has proven notoriously challenging for neurocognitive outcome. This study investigated the potential of machine learning to improve neurocognitive outcome prediction at two and five years of corrected age in preterm infants, using readily available predictors from the neonatal setting.
methodsPredictors originating from the antenatal and neonatal period of preterm infants born <30 weeks gestation were used to predict adverse neurocognitive outcome on the Bayley Scale and Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Machine learning models were compared to conventional logistic regression and validated using internal cross-validation.
resultsBest performing models were a random forest (two-year outcome) and a support vector machine (five-year outcome) with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.682 and 0.695 respectively, reaching high negative predictive values (95% and 91%, respectively). These models performed significantly better than the conventional models.
conclusionsThe models reached moderate overall predictive performance, yet with promising potential for early identification of children without adverse neurocognitive outcome. Machine learning modestly improved neurocognitive outcome prediction. Future research may harvest the predictive potential of a wider variety of routine (clinical) data, such as vital sign time series. IMPACT: Early prediction of neurocognitive outcome in preterm infants will enable targeted follow-up and deployment of early (preventative) interventions to improve outcome. Neurocognitive outcome remains notoriously challenging using conventional models, while existing machine learning models depend on advanced MRI-derived predictors with limited potential for implementation into daily clinical practice. This study developed machine learning models for neurocognitive outcome prediction using predictors that are readily available in neonatal settings. Neurocognitive outcome prediction remains challenging due to low AUC and PPV, however, the models demonstrate high NPV, indicating potential for identifying children at low risk for adverse outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39827255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.