Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39827235›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2025

A multifactorial, evidence-based analysis of pathophysiology in Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS).

Laura A Galdamez, Thomas H Mader, Joshua Ong, Cihan Mehmet Kadipasaoglu, Andrew G Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura A GaldamezDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Memorial Hermann The Woodlands, The Woodlands, TX, USA.
Thomas H MaderNASA Ophthalmology Consultant, Moab, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3956-8934
Joshua OngDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4860-827X
Cihan Mehmet KadipasaogluDepartment of Neurology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5390-372X
Andrew G LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA. aglee@houstonmethodist.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in the United States has been studying a fascinating and unique constellation of neuro-ophthalmic findings collectively known as Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS). SANS is unique to the space environment of microgravity and produces novel physiological and pathological findings that have no direct terrestrial equivalent. The neuro-ophthalmic phenomenon is a major physiologic barrier to future planetary spaceflight. The underlying pathophysiology of SANS remains ill-defined, but since its initial report in 2011, several hypotheses have been proposed including increased intracranial pressure, cerebral venous congestion and glymphatic stasis, compartmentalization of CSF within the orbital nerve sheath sub-arachnoid space (SAS), upward brain shift, inflammation, disrupted axoplasmic transport, and radiation exposure. These aetiologies may not be mutually exclusive and may be interconnected, leading to an integrative, multifactorial aetiology of SANS. This paper critically analyses the various hypotheses of this neuro-ophthalmic phenomenon and the connections between the physiologic and anatomical evidence-based changes observed in spaceflight and terrestrial analogues. Continued prospective, longitudinal study and development of practical countermeasures for SANS will be necessary for future human spaceflight missions including the mission to Mars.

Indexed as

Space FlightWeightlessnessHumansIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID39827235
PMCPMC11885454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.