ReviewEye (London, England)2025
A multifactorial, evidence-based analysis of pathophysiology in Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS).
Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A computational model for retinal haemodynamics under gravitational and postural variations.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Beyond Earth, Beyond Time: Preserving Female Fertility in Space Missions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comment on: 'A multifactorial, evidence-based analysis of pathophysiology in Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS)'.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in the United States has been studying a fascinating and unique constellation of neuro-ophthalmic findings collectively known as Spaceflight Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS). SANS is unique to the space environment of microgravity and produces novel physiological and pathological findings that have no direct terrestrial equivalent. The neuro-ophthalmic phenomenon is a major physiologic barrier to future planetary spaceflight. The underlying pathophysiology of SANS remains ill-defined, but since its initial report in 2011, several hypotheses have been proposed including increased intracranial pressure, cerebral venous congestion and glymphatic stasis, compartmentalization of CSF within the orbital nerve sheath sub-arachnoid space (SAS), upward brain shift, inflammation, disrupted axoplasmic transport, and radiation exposure. These aetiologies may not be mutually exclusive and may be interconnected, leading to an integrative, multifactorial aetiology of SANS. This paper critically analyses the various hypotheses of this neuro-ophthalmic phenomenon and the connections between the physiologic and anatomical evidence-based changes observed in spaceflight and terrestrial analogues. Continued prospective, longitudinal study and development of practical countermeasures for SANS will be necessary for future human spaceflight missions including the mission to Mars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.