ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and assessment of a mortality risk prediction nomogram model for pneumocystis disease in ICU within 28 days.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of lysine crotonylation-driven molecular clusters and immune dysregulation in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma via bioinformatics and machine learning.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- A nomogram-based clinical prediction model for adverse clinical outcomes in non-HIV Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia patients.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop and assess a nomogram predictive model for evaluating the 28-day mortality risk in patients diagnosed with Pneumocystis who have been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). From 2008 to 2022, clinical data on patients with Pneumocystis were collected using the American Critical Care Medical Information Database IV (MIMIC-IV). Initially, 63 significant predictive indicators were included, with ICU admission as the time node and all-cause mortality within 28 days as the outcome. Using complete data modeling, the variable selection approach combines two methods: Lasso regression (glmnet package) and collinearity screening (car package). Use the bootstrap method 1000 times for internal validation. Calculate the AUC, mean sensitivity, and specificity of 1000 resamplings, as well as the 95% confidence interval, and then plot the ROC, calibration, and DCA curves. The patients were split into two groups based on their 28-day survival status: 83 cases (67.48%) in the survival group and 40 instances (32.52%) in the death group. Five variables-the history of malignant tumors, Lods scores, Oasis scores, and complications of shock and severe renal injury-were eventually included in the entire sample after screening. According to Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, the model's sensitivity was 0.600 (95% CI 0.448-0.752), specificity was 0.904 (95% CI 0.840-0.967), and AUC was 0.814 (95% CI 0.732-0.897). The DCA curve indicates that the model application has high accuracy, which leads to a net benefit for population prediction, and the model calibration curve demonstrates good calibration accuracy. The bootstrap model's 1000 internal validation results demonstrate that the model's calibration performance is good and that its accuracy is highest when the probability of patient outcome events falls between 35 and 60%, which yields the highest net benefit for population prediction. This study developed a nomogram utilizing MIMIC-IV clinical big data to predict the 28-day mortality risk in patients with Pneumocystis disease. Incorporating five critical factors, the nomogram offers a user-friendly, visual method for calculating personalized risk scores based on patient-specific information, including medical history, laboratory results, and clinical scores. Demonstrating robust discrimination and calibration, this tool provides clinicians with a valuable resource for assessing prognosis and making evidence-based treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.