Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39827192›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Translation and validation of the meat attachment questionnaire (MAQ) in a French general practice population.

Bruno Delaunay, Benoit Tudrej, Augustin Bernard, Alexandra Dupuy, Claire Malavergne, Trystan Bacon, Paul Sebo, Hubert Maisonneuve

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bruno DelaunayUniversity College of General Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Benoit TudrejUniversity College of General Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Augustin BernardUniversity College of General Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Alexandra DupuyUniversity College of General Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Claire MalavergneUniversity College of General Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Trystan BaconUniversity College of General Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Paul SeboUniversity Institute for Primary Care (IuMFE), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Hubert MaisonneuveUniversity College of General Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France. hubert.maisonneuve@unige.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meat consumption has significant implications for both individual health and the environment. Understanding individuals' attachment to meat is crucial for designing effective interventions to reduce consumption. The MAQ is a tool developed to assess individuals' attachment to meat. This study aims to translate and validate the MAQ into French for use in a general practice population in France. The study was conducted in three phases: translation, pretesting through cognitive interviews, and testing through a cross-sectional study of general practice patients. Descriptive, factorial, and internal consistency analyses were performed to validate the French version of the MAQ. The French version of the MAQ consists of 17 items in four dimensions: Hedonism, Affinity, Entitlement, and Dependence. Face validity was confirmed by cognitive interviews. The RMSEA and CFI were 0.06 and 0.92 respectively, showing acceptable goodness-of-fit. Internal consistency was demonstrated with Cronbach's alpha and Loevinger's H coefficients exceeding 0.7 and 0.3, respectively. The French version of the MAQ is a valid and reliable tool for assessing individuals' attachment to meat in a general practice population. Its application shows promise for the design of targeted interventions to reduce meat consumption, benefiting both individual health and environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

General PracticeMeatAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslations

Identifiers

PMID39827192
PMCPMC11742934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.