ArticleNature communications2025
Single-step retrosynthesis prediction via multitask graph representation learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing biocatalytic retrosynthesis with a graph-to-graph model.Chemical science · 2026Article
- Higher-Level Strategies for Computer-Aided Retrosynthesis.ACS central science · 2026Article
- Progress of AI-Driven Drug-Target Interaction Prediction and Lead Optimization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Computational tools for nonnatural pathway design: Algorithms, applications, and challenges.Biodesign research · 2025Review
- Single-step retrosynthesis prediction via multitask graph representation learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inferring appropriate synthesis reaction (i.e., retrosynthesis) routes for newly designed molecules is vital. Recently, computational methods have produced promising single-step retrosynthesis predictions. However, template-based methods are limited by the known synthesis templates; template-free methods are weakly interpretable; and semi template-based methods are deficient with regard to utilizing the associations between chemical entities. To address these issues, this paper leverages the intra-associations between synthons, the inter-associations between synthons and leaving groups (LGs), and the intra-associations between LGs. It develops a multitask graph representation learning model for single-step retrosynthesis prediction (Retro-MTGR) to solve reaction centre deduction and LG identification simultaneously. A comparison with 16 state-of-the-art methods first demonstrates the superiority of Retro-MTGR. Then, its robustness and scalability and the contributions of its crucial components are validated. More importantly, it can determine whether a bond can be a reaction centre and what LGs are appropriate for a given synthon, respectively. The answers reflect underlying chemical synthesis rules, especially opposite electrical properties between chemical entities (e.g., reaction sites, synthons, and LGs). Finally, case studies demonstrate that the retrosynthesis routes inferred by Retro-MTGR are promising for single-step synthesis reactions. The code and data of this study are freely available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14346324 .
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.