ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the role of the metabolic score for visceral Fat in assessing the prevalence of chronic kidney disease from the NHANES 1999-2018.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visceral fat score predicts diabetic kidney disease: analysis of 20 years of U.S. NHANES data.Renal failure · 2026Article
- Hyperfiltration in Obesity: The Vicious Link Between Visceral Fat, Proteinuria, and Sodium Excretion.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Cumulative visceral fat burden and progression to advanced cardiovascular kidney metabolic syndrome in Chinese middle-aged and older adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Visceral fat metabolism score and cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages in all-cause and cause-specific mortality: insights from UK Biobank.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Article
- Associations of Sociodemographic Factors, Lifestyle Habits, and Insomnia Severity with Obesity Indices in Spanish Workers: Sex-Specific Differences.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the association between the Metabolic Score for Visceral Fat (METS-VF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), assessing METS-VF as a potential predictor of CKD risk. Utilizing data from the 1999-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), this cross-sectional study included 24,387 adult participants. Multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic spline models, and threshold effect analyses were employed to explore the relationship. The results revealed a significant positive association, with multivariable logistic regression showing that each unit increase in METS-VF was associated with an 86% higher risk of CKD (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.48-2.34). Critical METS-VF thresholds (6.10 and 7.55) were identified, at which CKD risk increased substantially. Subgroup analyses indicated that the association was particularly pronounced among older adults and males. These findings suggest that METS-VF is a reliable predictor for assessing CKD risk and that lifestyle interventions, including dietary modifications and exercise programs, may mitigate this risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.