Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39827174›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2025

Comparative metagenomics reveals the metabolic flexibility of coastal prokaryotic microbiomes contributing to lignin degradation.

Qiannan Peng, Lu Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qiannan PengInstitute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China.
Lu LinInstitute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China. linlu2019@sdu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFC3403500National Natural Science Foundation of China 32370115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coastal wetlands are rich in terrestrial organic carbon. Recent studies suggest that microbial consortia play a role in lignin degradation in coastal wetlands, where lignin turnover rates are likely underestimated. However, the metabolic potentials of these consortia remain elusive. This greatly hinders our understanding of the global carbon cycle and the "bottom-up" design of synthetic consortia to enhance lignin conversion. Here, we developed two groups of lignin degrading consortia, L6 and L18, through the 6- and 18-month in situ lignin enrichments in the coastal East China Sea, respectively. Lignin degradation by L18 was 3.6-fold higher than L6. Using read-based analysis, 16S rRNA amplicon and metagenomic sequencing suggested that these consortia possessed varied taxonomic compositions, yet similar functional traits. Further comparative metagenomic analysis, based on metagenomic assembly, revealed that L18 harbored abundant metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) that encoded diverse and unique lignin degradation gene clusters (LDGCs). Importantly, anaerobic MAGs were significantly enriched in L18, highlighting the role of anaerobic lignin degradation. Furthermore, the generalist taxa, which possess metabolic flexibility, increased during the extended enrichment period, indicating the advantage of generalists in adapting to heterogenous resources. This study advances our understanding of the metabolic strategies of coastal prokaryotic consortia and lays a foundation for the design of synthetic communities for sustainable lignocellulose biorefining.

Indexed as

Coastal wetlandsLignin degradationLignin degradation gene clustersMetagenome-assembled genomesProkaryotic consortia

Identifiers

PMID39827174
PMCPMC11742803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.