ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Endoscopic ultrasonography-based intratumoral and peritumoral machine learning ultrasomics model for predicting the pathological grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence versus conventional imaging for differentiating G2/G3 from G1 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasonography: From Image-Based Diagnosis to Cytopathology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Interpretable deep learning model and nomogram for predicting pathological grading of PNETs based on endoscopic ultrasound.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Application of Explainable Artificial Intelligence Based on Visual Explanation in Digestive Endoscopy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe objective is to develop and validate intratumoral and peritumoral ultrasomics models utilizing endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to predict pathological grading in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs).
methodsEighty-one patients, including 51 with grade 1 PNETs and 30 with grade 2/3 PNETs, were included in this retrospective study after confirmation through pathological examination. The patients were randomly allocated to the training or test group in a 6:4 ratio. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used for screening clinical and ultrasonic characteristics. Ultrasomics is ultrasound-based radiomics. Ultrasomics features were extracted from both the intratumoral and peritumoral regions of conventional EUS images. Subsequently, the dimensionality of these radiomics features was reduced using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm. A machine learning algorithm, namely multilayer perception (MLP), was employed to construct prediction models using only the nonzero coefficient features and retained clinical features, respectively.
resultsOne hundred seven ultrasomics features based on EUS were extracted, and only features with nonzero coefficients were ultimately retained. Among all the models, the combined ultrasomics model achieved the greatest performance, with an AUC of 0.858 (95% CI, 0.7512 - 0.9642) in the training group and 0.842 (95% CI, 0.7061 - 0.9785) in the test group. A calibration curve and a decision curve analysis (DCA) also demonstrated its accuracy and utility.
conclusionsThe integrated model using EUS ultrasomics features from intratumoral and peritumoral tumors accurately predicts PNETs' pathological grades pre-surgery, aiding personalized treatment planning.
trial registrationChiCTR2400091906.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.