ReviewArchives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists2025
Cognitive Functioning in Females with Endometriosis-Associated Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Literature Review.
Review in Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Selected Parameters of the Mental State of Women with Endometriosis-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Neurobiological Signatures of Endometriosis: Characterizing Pain, Cognition, and Brain Morphology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Executive Functions Mediate Between Endometriosis Burden and Women's Daily Life.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- The Silent Cognitive Burden of Chronic Pain: Protocol for an AI-Enhanced Living Dose-Response Bayesian Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Role of Plant-Based Diets and Personalized Nutrition in Endometriosis Management: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCognitive complaints are commonplace among women living with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain (CPP); yet, surprisingly few studies have assessed their cognitive functioning. As an initial step to address the resulting knowledge gap, this review aimed to synthesize the current literature reporting on cognition in females with endometriosis-associated CPP, and due to the poverty of endometriosis studies, to draw on data from female cohorts with other chronic pain conditions to gain potentially relevant insights.
methodsThree database searches were conducted (Scopus, PubMed, and PsycINFO). Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 8 regarding endometriosis, n = 10 regarding other chronic pain conditions).
resultsSix of the seven studies employing objective cognitive measures in females with other chronic pain reported significant cognitive deficits. Associated changes in neural circuitry thought to underpin these deficits align with neural patterns reported in females with endometriosis-associated CPP. While two studies reported a high prevalence (≥60%) of self-reported cognitive impairment in endometriosis-associated CPP, objective performance deficits have not been reported. Nonetheless, self-reported accounts of cognitive impairment suggest females with endometriosis-associated CPP may experience difficulties with inhibition, attention, and memory. Most studies did not control for potential moderating factors and comorbidities that prevail among endometriosis populations.
conclusionThe field is in desperate need of research assessing cognitive performance in females with endometriosis-associated CPP, to objectively determine any cognitive difficulties. Attention should be paid to likely moderators, pain-related mechanisms, and whether findings extend to endometriosis without CPP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.