ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2025
Curation of gene-disease relationships in primary antibody deficiencies using the ClinGen validation framework.
Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole Genome Sequencing as First Diagnostic Approach for Inborn Errors of Immunity in Adults: Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Correlations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Inborn errors of immunity: Manifestation, treatment, and outcome-an ESID registry 1994-2024 report on 30,628 patients.Journal of human immunity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) is an international collaborative effort among scientists and clinicians, diagnostic and research laboratories, and the patient community. Using a standardized framework, ClinGen has established guidelines to classify gene-disease relationships as definitive, strong, moderate, and limited on the basis of available scientific and clinical evidence. When the genetic and functional evidence for a gene-disease relationship has conflicting interpretations or contradictory evidence, they can be disputed or refuted.
objectiveWe assessed genes related to primary antibody deficiencies.
methodsThe ClinGen Antibody Deficiencies Gene Curation Expert Panel, using the ClinGen framework, classified genes related to primary antibody deficiency that primarily affect B-cell development and/or function, and that account for the largest proportion of inborn errors of immunity or primary immunodeficiencies.
resultsThe expert panel curated a total of 65 genes associated with humoral immune defects to validate 74 gene-disease relationships. Of these, 40 were classified as definitive, 1 as strong, 16 as moderate, 15 as limited, and 2 as disputed. The curation process involved reviewing 490 patient records and 3546 associated human phenotype ontology entries. The 3 most frequently observed terms related to primary antibody deficiency were decreased circulating antibody level, pneumonia, and lymphadenopathy.
conclusionsThese curations (publicly available at ClinicalGenome.org) represent the first effort to provide a comprehensive genetic and phenotypic revision of genetic disorders affecting humoral immunity, as reviewed and approved by experts in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.