ArticleVaccine2025
Prolonged immune response to tick-borne Ehrlichia chaffeensis infection using a genetically modified live vaccine.
Article in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Trends in Vaccine Research onMicroorganisms · 2026Review
- Article
- The 'teabag method': tick feeding protocol and the effects of tick feeding on hematological parameters in the canine host.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ehrlichia chaffeensis, a tick transmitted rickettsial bacterium, causes monocytic ehrlichiosis in humans and dogs. Earlier, we demonstrated that dogs immunized with a mutant strain of E. chaffeensis having a functional disruption in the gene encoding the phage head-to-tail connector protein serves as a modified live vaccine (MLAV) capable of inducing immunity against intravenous and tick-transmitted infection challenges within one month of vaccination. In this follow-up investigation, we assessed the duration of MLAV-induced immunity for one-year period against tick-transmission infection challenge. Dogs vaccinated with the MLAV were subsequently exposed to wild-type E. chaffeensis via tick transmission at 4-, 8-, and 12-months post-vaccination. Unvaccinated controls showed higher infection rates during the one-month assessment following infection. In contrast, MLAV-immunized dogs rapidly cleared infections and exhibited significantly fewer systemic bacterial infections compared to unvaccinated controls. Robust E. chaffeensis-specific IgG and CD4 T-cell responses persisted throughout the assessment period. Our findings underscore the efficacy of MLAV in providing natural hosts with protection against E. chaffeensis infection for up to one year following infected tick exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.