Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39826140›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2025

Integrating Deep Learning Derived Morphological Traits and Molecular Data for Total-Evidence Phylogenetics: Lessons from Digitized Collections.

Roberta Hunt, José L Reyes-Hernández, Josh Jenkins Shaw, Alexey Solodovnikov, Kim Steenstrup Pedersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roberta HuntDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 1, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1963-3281
José L Reyes-HernándezNatural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.
Josh Jenkins ShawNatural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.
Alexey SolodovnikovNatural History Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen DK-2100, Denmark.
Kim Steenstrup PedersenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 1, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has previously shown success in automatically generating morphological traits that carry a phylogenetic signal. In this paper, we explore combining molecular data with deep learning derived morphological traits from images of pinned insects to generate total-evidence phylogenies and we reveal challenges. Deep learning derived morphological traits, while informative, underperformed when used in isolation compared to molecular analyses. However, they can improve molecular results in total evidence settings. We use a dataset of rove beetle images to compare the effect of different dataset splits and deep metric loss functions on morphological and total evidence results. We find a slight preference for the cladistic dataset split and contrastive loss function. Additionally, we explore the effect of varying the number of genes used in inference and find that different gene combinations provide the best results when used on their own vs in total evidence analysis. Despite the promising nature of integrating deep learning techniques with molecular data, challenges remain regarding the strength of the phylogenetic signal and the resource demands of data acquisition. We suggest that future work focus on improved trait extraction and the development of disentangled networks to better interpret the derived traits, thus expanding the applicability of these methods in phylogenetic studies.

Indexed as

ClassificationColeopteraDeep LearningPhylogenyAnimalscladisticsContinuous morphological traitsdeep metric learningimage analysisneural networksphylogeneticstotal evidence analysis

Identifiers

PMID39826140
PMCPMC12162172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.