Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39826091›Full record

ArticleJAMA2025

A Unified Approach to Health Data Exchange: A Report From the US DHHS.

Ali B Abbasi, Jennifer Layden, William Gordon, Susan Gregurick, Nancy DeLew, Jordan Grossman, Arlene S Bierman, Susan Monarez, Lesley H Curtis, Abigail H Viall and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Opportunities and obstacles in harnessing intraoperative data.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026
    Article
  6. A Review of the Importance and Relevance of Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Ali B AbbasiUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Jennifer LaydenCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
William GordonCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland.
Susan GregurickNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Nancy DeLewOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
Jordan GrossmanHealth Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland.
Arlene S BiermanAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.
Susan MonarezAdvanced Research Projects Agency for Health, Washington, DC.
Lesley H CurtisUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Abigail H ViallCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mitra RoccaUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Donna R RiveraUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Hilary MarstonUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Alexandra MuggeCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland.
Scott R SmithOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
Katherine BentOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
James MacraeHealth Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland.
Ann SheehyHealth Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland.
Renee D WegrzynAdvanced Research Projects Agency for Health, Washington, DC.
R Burciaga ValdezAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.
Carole JohnsonHealth Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland.
Laina BushOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
Jonathan BlumCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mandy K CohenCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Monica M BertagnolliNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Robert M CaliffUS Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Micky TripathiAssistant Secretary for Technology Policy/Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT, Washington, DC.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Health information technology, such as electronic health records (EHRs), has been widely adopted, yet accessing and exchanging data in the fragmented US health care system remains challenging. To unlock the potential of EHR data to improve patient health, public health, and health care, it is essential to streamline the exchange of health data. As leaders across the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), we describe how DHHS has implemented fundamental building blocks to achieve this vision. Observations: Across DHHS, we have implemented 3 foundational building blocks called for by the 2016 21st Century Cures Act to create a unified approach for secure, high-quality, and timely exchange of health data across the health care system. The United States Core Data for Interoperability provides a minimum baseline for data elements that must be available in federally regulated health information technology systems such as certified EHRs. These data elements now must be accessible using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources-a secure, flexible, and open-industry standard for health data exchange. The Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement provides a network to securely exchange health data across the country. The 3 building blocks of United States Core Data for Interoperability, Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources, and Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement are now in place thanks to diligent public and private sector work over 2 administrations. Across DHHS, we are working to refine these building blocks and increase their adoption through regulatory authorities, grants, and public-private partnerships. Conclusions and Relevance: The technological building blocks described in this article are creating a unified approach to health data exchange for patient access, clinical care, quality improvement, scientific research, public health, and other uses of health data. Collaborations between the public, nonprofit, and private sectors are needed to maximize their potential. By unlocking the potential of health data, these building blocks are the foundation of a 21st-century digital health care system that will improve the experience of patients and clinicians and result in better health outcomes.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth Information ExchangeHealth Information InteroperabilityMedical Record LinkageUnited States Dept. of Health and Human ServicesHumansIntersectoral CollaborationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39826091
PMCPMC11936714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.