SynthesisPaediatric drugs2025
Adverse Events of Factor Xa Inhibitors in Pediatric Patients: A Meta-analysis and Pharmacovigilance Study.
Synthesis in Paediatric drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to provide a comprehensive review of adverse events (AEs) associated with factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors in pediatric patients.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the European Union Clinical Trials Register for English-language records from the establishment of the database up to October 17, 2023. Both randomized controlled trials and single-arm trials were included. AEs were analyzed using a Bayesian hierarchical model. For the pharmacovigilance study, data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2023, were obtained. The proportional imbalance method and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency method were used to detect AE signals. Further characterization of patients presenting with AEs was performed.
resultsOf 451 records identified, 12 eligible studies were included. A total of 50.6% (95% Bayesian credible interval [CrI] 33.1-67.2, τ = 0.796) of patients experienced at least one AE, and 9.9% (95% CrI 3.9-19.5, τ = 0.552) developed at least one serious AE. Major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 2.4% (95% CrI 0.8-4.8, τ = 1.61) of patients. The most common bleeding AEs were epistaxis (8.4% [95% CrI 3.9-14.9, τ = 1.96]), subcutaneous hematoma (6.4% [95% CrI 0.5-26.2, τ = 0.54]), and wound hemorrhage (3.7% [95% CrI 0.4-13.3, τ = 0.55]). Non-hemorrhagic AEs were pyrexia (9.2% [95% CrI 4.6-15.3, τ = 1.18]), vomiting (7.8% [95% CrI 4.0-12.3, τ = 0.08]), and abdominal pain (7.4% [95% CrI 1.5-19.4, τ = 0.84]). A total of 39 AE signals were detected in the pharmacovigilance study. The top three highest overall relative odds ratio (ROR) for AEs were observed for haemorrhoidal hemorrhage at 1211.82 (95% CI, 312.69-4696.29), thrombophlebitis at 134.64 (95% CI, 42.18-429.81), and deep vein thrombosis at 68.3 (95% CI, 42.53-109.68). Patients experiencing bleeding AEs had received a mean dosage of rivaroxaban 0.16 mg/kg and apixaban 0.08 mg/kg.
conclusionsSystematically quantified AEs of FXa inhibitors in clinical trials and real-world studies provide an important guide for clinicians. The use of FXa inhibitors in pediatric patients is associated with an acceptable rate of AEs. The most common bleeding AE was epistaxis. Pediatric patients treated with FXa inhibitors were more prone to hemorrhoidal hemorrhage. A safe approach may involve prior use of other anticoagulants followed by careful administration of FXa inhibitors, with a dosing regimen tailored to age and weight. Close monitoring is recommended for peri-procedural anticoagulation and vomiting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.