Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2025
Short-term efficacy and safety of PreserFlo MicroShunt in Japanese patients with medically treated primary open-angle glaucoma.
Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of one-year postoperative outcomes between PreserFlo MicroShunt and trabeculectomy in Japanese patients with open angle glaucoma: a retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- 2024 survey of the frequency of fixed-combination eye drop use by patients with glaucoma at multiple private practices in Japan.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism following PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation versus trabeculectomy in Japanese patients with glaucoma.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Preclinical assessment of Preserflo MicroShunt implantation using an intraocular endoscope-holding robot.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Short-term outcomes of the PreserFlo MicroShunt in Japanese patients with exfoliation glaucoma: a comparison with primary open-angle glaucoma using propensity score matching.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the efficacy and safety of PreserFlo MicroShunt (PMS) combined with mitomycin C in patients with medically treated primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). STUDY
designA retrospective observational study.
methodsThe study examined 83 eyes from 83 patients with medically treated glaucoma surgery naive POAG. Preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) was stratified into three groups: IOP < 15 mmHg (group 1), 15 ≤ IOP < 21 mmHg (group 2), and IOP ≥ 21 mmHg (group 3). IOP levels at week 1, month 1, month 3, and month 6 were evaluated using a linear mixed model, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to assess the complete success rate (30% IOP reduction without any medications or interventions) of IOP management. The postoperative complications and interventions were also evaluated.
resultsOverall, the mean IOP decreased from 19.2 ± 7.4 mmHg to 11.3 ± 3.1 mmHg, representing a 41% IOP reduction. Especially, in group 1 (mean IOP of 12.8 mmHg), IOP decreased to 10.3 mmHg, achieving a reduction rate of 20%. Overall, 51% (95% confidence interval [CI] 41-62%) of the patients maintained a ≥ 30% IOP reduction (complete success). Minor complications included hypotony (n = 10) and hyphema (n = 30). Needling was performed in 12 eyes, bleb revision in 2, tube re-insertion in 2, and insertion of a second tube in 1.
conclusionsPMS demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing IOP in patients with POAG reagrdless of its preoperative IOP levels. No serious complications affecting the VA were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39826074What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.