Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39826040›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2025

Impact of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb® on meropenem and piperacillin exposure in critically ill patients in a post-CKRT setup: a single-center, retrospective data analysis.

Golschan Asgarpur, Franz Weber, Peggy Kiessling, Nilufar Akbari, Fabian Stroben, Bernadette Kleikamp, Charlotte Kloft, Sascha Treskatsch, Stefan Angermair

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Novel extracorporeal therapies in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Antibiotics and Other Drugs Removal by the CytoSorbAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Correction: Impact of hemoadsorption with CytoSorbIntensive care medicine experimental · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Golschan Asgarpur *Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. Golschan.Asgarpur@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5328-2812
Franz Weber *Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Kelchstr. 31, 12169, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4654-7434
Peggy KiesslingLabor Berlin-Charité Vivantes GmbH, 13353, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4851-563X
Nilufar AkbariFreie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-4956
Fabian StrobenFreie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9878-6613
Bernadette KleikampFreie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-7750-6360
Charlotte KloftDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Kelchstr. 31, 12169, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9344-8514
Sascha TreskatschFreie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0549-7680
Stefan AngermairFreie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5440-6968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCytoSorb® (CS) adsorbent is a hemoadsorption filter for extracorporeal blood purification often integrated into continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). It is primarily used in critically ill patients with sepsis and related conditions, including cytokine storms and systemic inflammatory responses. Up to now, there is no evidence nor recommendation for the use of CS filters in sepsis (22). There is limited clinical data on the effect of CS on the plasma concentrations of beta-lactams. We aimed to evaluate the statistical and clinical impact of CS in a post-filter CKRT-CS setting on the plasma concentrations of the antibiotics meropenem and piperacillin in critically ill patients.

methodsPatients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) who received a prolonged infusion of piperacillin or meropenem with CS-combined CKRT were included in this retrospective analysis. TDM (therapeutic drug monitoring) plasma blood samples were collected at three different points. The differences in antibiotic concentrations between Pre, Intra, and Post were statistically compared to evaluate the total and isolated contributions of CKRT and CS to antibiotic removal. CS, CKRT and combined clearance (CL) values were calculated. The hypothesis was that the CS filter would have no clinically relevant impact on antibiotic levels.

results207 TDM samples were taken from 24 critically ill patients requiring beta-lactam antibiotics. Among these, 129 were meropenem samples, and 78 were piperacillin samples. A decrease in both antibiotic levels was observed between Pre and Intra, and Pre and Post, and the median relative difference between was >15% (meropenem: Pre-Intra 34.8%, Pre-Post 35.8%; piperacillin: Pre-Intra 41.1%, Pre-Post 34.7%), indicating a statistically and clinically significant effect of CKRT on both antibiotic exposures. No significant difference was observed between Intra and Post indicating no clinically relevant drug removal via the CS filter. Changes in CL attributed to CS were minimal, with combined CL differing by ≤8.60% compared to CKRT clearance.

conclusionThe application of CS does not appear to significantly affect plasma concentrations of meropenem and piperacillin in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

CytoSorb®Extracorporeal therapyHemoadsorptionMeropenemPiperacillin/tazobactamTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)

Identifiers

PMID39826040
PMCPMC11741966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.