ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Vulvar lichen planus a retrospective analysis.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vulvar lichen planus (VLP) is a rare mucocutaneous disorder with significant impacts on quality of life and a potential risk of malignancy. Comprehensive data on its clinical features and treatment outcomes remain limited. To analyze the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with VLP and to evaluate the efficacy of current therapeutic approaches. A retrospective review was conducted on 70 female patients diagnosed with VLP at a single institution between January 2014 and August 2024. Clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed using Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and χ² test as appropriate. The mean age at diagnosis was 59.3 ± 12.4 years, with a median disease duration of 2 years (range: 6 months-10 years). Pruritus (80.0%) and dyspareunia (62.9%) were the most prevalent symptoms. Corticosteroid therapy was the mainstay treatment, administered to 97.1% of patients, with superpotent topical corticosteroids being the most common (47.1%). Remission was achieved in 25.7% of cases, with younger patients exhibiting significantly higher remission rates (p = 0.005). Thyroid disease was the most common comorbid autoimmune condition, present in 32.9% of patients. VLP predominantly affects middle-aged women, with corticosteroids remaining the first-line therapy. Younger age appears to be associated with better treatment outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of early intervention and individualized therapeutic strategies. Further studies are warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms driving age-related differences in disease outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39825959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.