ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
The treatment of acute traumatic aortic injuries with TEVAR: a retrospective analysis of 19 cases in a level-1 trauma center.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBlunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI) is a critical condition and a leading cause of mortality in trauma patients, often resulting from high-speed accidents. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has developed into the preferred therapeutic approach due to its minimally invasive nature and promising outcomes. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of TEVAR for managing TAI over a 10-year period at a Level-1 trauma center.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 19 patients with acute TAI treated with TEVAR between 2012 and 2022 at the University Hospital Zurich. Data were collected from digital records and analyzed according to the Fillinger TEVAR reporting framework. Outcomes included technical success, perioperative complications, and long-term graft durability.
resultsThe cohort had a mean age of 39 years and included patients with severe polytrauma. Technical success was achieved in 95% of cases, with no intraoperative deaths or need for open surgical conversion. Perioperative complications were minimal, and the reintervention rate was 5.3%. This study evaluates 10 years of clinical experience managing TAI with TEVAR. Long-term follow-up, with a median duration of 29 months, revealed no graft-related complications or secondary interventions. Imaging confirmed sustained graft integrity, and clinical outcomes were favorable.
conclusionTEVAR is a reliable and effective treatment for traumatic aortic injuries, offering excellent technical success rates and minimal perioperative and long-term complications. This study highlights TEVAR's advantages in managing polytrauma patients and its role as a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. Additionally, the findings emphasize the need for comprehensive long-term follow-up protocols. Future research should aim to address challenges related to device durability and the integration of advanced imaging techniques to further enhance patient outcomes and broaden the applicability of TEVAR in trauma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.