SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2025
Clinical efficacy and safety of sodium thiosulfate in the treatment of uremic pruritus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Pruritus in Hemodialysis: Unraveling Mechanisms and Emerging Therapeutic Targets-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in the clinical applications of sodium thiosulphate.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uremic pruritus (UP) is a debilitating condition frequently associated with chronic kidney disease, severely impairing patients' quality of life and contributing to increased mortality. Recent studies have suggested that intravenous sodium thiosulfate (STS) may offer therapeutic relief for pruritus in patients undergoing hemodialysis. To assess its effectiveness, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the potential of intravenous STS in managing UP. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed up to September 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical efficacy of STS in treating UP. Eight studies, encompassing 520 participants, were included in the analysis. The findings indicated that the STS group achieved a significantly higher rate of pruritus suppression compared to control groups. The STS group showed a marked reduction in the Visual Analogue Scale (weighted mean difference = -5.023; 95% CI: -6.137 to -3.909; P < 0.001) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (weighted mean difference = -4.754; 95% CI: -5.432 to -4.075; P < 0.001). The STS group demonstrated a decrease in CRP levels compared to the non-treatment group in the context of treating UP (WMD = -1.269; 95% CI: -2.014 to -0.523; P = 0.007). No significant differences were observed between the STS and control groups regarding parathyroid hormone, serum calcium, or serum inorganic phosphorus. While this meta-analysis demonstrated a reduction in pruritus symptoms with STS administration, the evidence remains insufficient to conclusively support its therapeutic benefit in managing UP. Further well-designed studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39825932What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.