Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825916›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2025

HIF-1 and HIF-2 in cancer: structure, regulation, and therapeutic prospects.

Yi Shi, Daniele M Gilkes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Progress and challenges in the development of advanced pancreatic cancer organoids.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yi ShiDepartment of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniele M GilkesDepartment of Oncology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. dgilkes1@jh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3984-9338

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypoxia, or a state of low tissue oxygenation, has been characterized as an important feature of solid tumors that is related to aggressive phenotypes. The cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), a family of transcription factors. HIFs promote the transcription of gene products that play a role in tumor progression including proliferation, angiogenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance. HIF-1 and HIF-2 are well known and widely described. Although these proteins share a high degree of homology, HIF-1 and HIF-2 have non-redundant roles in cancer. In this review, we summarize the similarities and differences between HIF-1α and HIF-2α in their structure, expression, and DNA binding. We also discuss the canonical and non-canonical regulation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α under hypoxic and normal conditions. Finally, we outline recent strategies aimed at targeting HIF-1α and/or HIF-2α.

Indexed as

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitNeoplasmsAnimalsEndothelial PAS Domain-Containing Protein 1Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsEndothelial PAS Domain-Containing Protein 1Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitCancerHIF-1HIF-2HypoxiaTumor

Identifiers

PMID39825916
PMCPMC11741981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.