Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825915›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2025

Evidence for Multiple Independent Expansions of Fox Gene Families Within Flatworms.

Ludwik Gąsiorowski

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ludwik GąsiorowskiFaculty of Biology, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Warsaw, Ul. Żwirki I Wigury 101, 02-089, Warsaw, Poland. ludwik.gasiorowski@uw.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-2238-7587

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung The Humboldt Research Fellowship for Postdoctoral ResearchersNarodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej BPN/PPO/2023/1/00002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expansion and losses of gene families are important drivers of molecular evolution. A recent survey of Fox genes in flatworms revealed that this superfamily of multifunctional transcription factors, present in all animals, underwent extensive losses and expansions during platyhelminth evolution. In this paper, I analyzed Fox gene complement in four additional species of platyhelminths, that represent early-branching lineages in the flatworm phylogeny: catenulids (Stenostomum brevipharyngium and Stenostomum leucops) and macrostomorphs (Macrostomum hystrix and Macrostomum cliftonense). Phylogenetic analysis of Fox genes from this expanded set of species provided evidence for multiple independent expansions of Fox gene families within flatworms. Notably, FoxG, a panbilaterian brain-patterning gene, appears to be the least susceptible to duplication, while FoxJ1, a conserved ciliogenesis factor, has undergone extensive expansion in various flatworm lineages. Analysis of the single-cell atlas of S. brevipharyngium, combined with RNA in situ hybridization, elucidated the tissue-specific expression of the selected Fox genes: FoxG is expressed in the brain, three of the Fox genes (FoxN2/3-2, FoxO4 and FoxP1) are expressed in the pharyngeal cells of likely glandular function, while one of the FoxQD paralogs is specifically expressed in the protonephridium. Overall, the evolution of Fox genes in flatworms appears to be characterized by an early contraction of the gene complement, followed by lineage-specific expansions that have enabled the co-option of newly evolved paralogs into novel physiological and developmental functions.

Indexed as

Forkhead Transcription FactorsPlatyhelminthsAnimalsEvolution, MolecularMultigene FamilyPhylogenyForkhead Transcription FactorsCatenulidaForkheadMacrostomumPlatyhelminthesSpiraliaTranscription factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.