Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Effects of combined transversus abdominis plane block under direct vision and acupoint injection on promoting rapid recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo study the effect of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block under direct vision with acupoint injection on the rapid recovery of patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
methodsNinety-three patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2023 to December 2023 were selected and divided into control, TAP block under direct vision (TAP-DV), and TAP-DV with acupoint injection (TAP-DVA) groups using a random number table method. Postoperative VAS, Ramsay score, IL-6, CRP, and postoperative rehabilitation indices were compared among the three groups.
resultsThe VAS pain score at 6 h after surgery was significantly lower in the TAP-DV and TAP-DVA groups than in the control group (P < 0.05). The VAS pain score at 24 h after surgery was significantly lower in the TAP-DV and TAP-DVA groups than in the control group (P < 0.05) and was significantly lower in the TAP-DVA group than in the TAP-DV group (P < 0.05). The VAS pain score 48 h after surgery was significantly lower in the TAP-DVA group than in the control and TAP-DV groups (P < 0.05). The mean IL-6 level was significantly lower in the TAP-DVA and TAP-DV groups than in the control group (P < 0.05). The postoperative nausea and vomiting rate was significantly lower in the TAP-DVA group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The postoperative exhaust time was earlier in the TAP-DV and TAP-DVA groups than in the control group (P < 0.05) and was earlier in the TAP-DVA group than in the TAP group (P < 0.05). The postoperative hospitalization days and total cost were significantly lower in the TAP-DV and TAP-DVA groups than in the control group (P < 0.05).
conclusionTAP-DVA has a stable and good analgesic effect and can promote rapid recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.