ArticleNeuroradiology2025
Machine learning-based assessment of morphometric abnormalities distinguishes bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal classification of mood disorders using structural MRI and polygenic risk scores: a machine learning ablation study in UK Biobank.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Leveraging machine learning models to evaluate immune infiltration in the ovarian cancer microenvironment: a single-cell analysis approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) have overlapping clinical presentations which may make it difficult for clinicians to distinguish them potentially resulting in misdiagnosis. This study combined structural MRI and machine learning techniques to determine whether regional morphological differences could distinguish patients with BD and MDD.
methodsA total of 123 participants, including BD (n = 31), MDD (n = 48), and healthy controls (HC, n = 44), underwent high-resolution 3D T1-weighted imaging. Cortical thickness, surface area, and subcortical volumes were measured using FreeSurfer software. Common and classic machine learning models were utilized to identify distinct morphometric alterations between BD and MDD.
resultsSignificant morphological differences were observed in both common and distinct brain regions between BD, MDD, and HC. Specifically, abnormalities in the amygdala, thalamus, medial orbitofrontal cortex and fusiform were observed in both BD and MDD compared with HC. Relative to HC, unique differences in BD were identified in the lateral occipital and inferior/middle temporal regions, whereas MDD exhibited differences in nucleus accumbens and middle temporal regions. BD exhibited larger surface area in right middle temporal gyrus and greater right nucleus accumbens volume compared to MDD. The integration of two-stage models, including deep neural network (DNN) and support vector machine (SVM), achieved an accuracy rate of 91.2% in discriminating individuals with BD from MDD.
conclusionThese findings demonstrate that structural MRI combined with machine learning techniques can accurately discriminate individuals with BD from MDD, and provide a foundation supporting the potential of this approach to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39825893What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.