Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825788›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2025

Rationale and Ethical Assessment of an Oropharyngeal Gonorrhea Controlled Human Infection Model.

Eloise Williams, Jane S Hocking, Christopher K Fairley, Marcus Y Chen, Deborah A Williamson, James S McCarthy, Euzebiusz Jamrozik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eloise WilliamsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity.ORCID 0000-0002-5654-896X
Jane S HockingMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne.
Christopher K FairleyMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health.
Marcus Y ChenMelbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health.
Deborah A WilliamsonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity.
James S McCarthyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity.
Euzebiusz JamrozikDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2005380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the causative agent of gonorrhea, causes significant morbidity worldwide and can have long-term impacts on reproductive health. The greatest global burden of gonorrhea occurs in low- and middle-income settings. Global public health significance is increasing due to rising antimicrobial resistance, which threatens future gonorrhea management. The oropharynx is an important asymptomatic reservoir for gonorrhea transmission and a high-risk site for development of antimicrobial resistance and treatment failure. Controlled human infection model (CHIM) studies using N gonorrhoeae may provide a means to accelerate the development of urgently needed therapeutics, vaccines, and other biomedical prevention strategies. A gonorrhea urethritis CHIM has been used since the 1980s with no reported serious adverse events. Here, we describe the rationale for an oropharyngeal gonorrhea CHIM, including analysis of potential ethical issues that should inform the development of this novel study design.

Indexed as

GonorrheaNeisseria gonorrhoeaeOropharynxFemaleHumansMaleantimicrobial resistancecontrolled human infection modelethicsgonorrheasexually transmitted infection

Identifiers

PMID39825788
PMCPMC11998581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.