ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025
Abdominal wound dehiscence after appendectomy during pregnancy treated by negative pressure wound therapy with subsequent vaginal delivery: A case report and literature review.
Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Staged Management of Extensive Suprapubic Wound Necrosis After Hysterectomy Using Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Delayed Skin Grafting.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Delayed Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: Diagnostic Pitfalls, Multisurgical Management, and a Prolonged Postoperative Course-A Multidisciplinary Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Abdominal wound dehiscence after appendectomy during pregnancy treated by negative pressure wound therapy with subsequent vaginal delivery: A case report and literature review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a very effective method in the treatment of dehiscent, infected, and non-healing wounds. Difficult wound healing occurs especially in late pregnancy due to the rapid enlargement of the uterus and the constantly increasing tension of the entire abdominal wall. In cases of dehiscence of the surgical wound during pregnancy, proper subsequent treatment is needed, where it is necessary to consider the safety of the mother as well as the fetus. We report the case of a 30-week pregnant patient who was surgically treated for acute appendicitis in pregnancy with an open appendectomy approach. Postoperative complications resulted in wound dehiscence with complete defect in fascia, which was treated with negative V.A.C. ATS® Therapy System. The therapy was started in the 30th week of pregnancy and continued until delivery with regular check-ups and regular redressing of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system. At 38 weeks of pregnancy, the patient delivered vaginally with continued VAC therapy in situ. The final suture took place 3 days after vaginal delivery. Non-healing wounds with abdominal wall defects should be treated using a multidisciplinary approach, and NPWT can be used. This therapy can also be used during pregnancy. Vaginal delivery is preferred because it reduces the risk of further formation or deepening of the abdominal wall defect after a sufficient time interval from the start of the treatment. This complex case with a literature review of surgical complications in pregnancy treated with NPWT therapy highlights the advantage of a multidisciplinary approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.