Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825682›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Abdominal wound dehiscence after appendectomy during pregnancy treated by negative pressure wound therapy with subsequent vaginal delivery: A case report and literature review.

Jan Zapletal, Borek Sehnal, Radim Dvorak, Miroslav Drienko, Radovan Vlk, Michael J Halaska, Lukas Rob

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Abdominal wound dehiscence after appendectomy during pregnancy treated by negative pressure wound therapy with subsequent vaginal delivery: A case report and literature review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan ZapletalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2705-2970
Borek SehnalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2622-2181
Radim DvorakDepartment of Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8493-2066
Miroslav DrienkoDepartment of Surgery, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Radovan VlkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Michael J HalaskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3391-1412
Lukas RobDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague 10, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-651X

Funding

Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health, University of Bergen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a very effective method in the treatment of dehiscent, infected, and non-healing wounds. Difficult wound healing occurs especially in late pregnancy due to the rapid enlargement of the uterus and the constantly increasing tension of the entire abdominal wall. In cases of dehiscence of the surgical wound during pregnancy, proper subsequent treatment is needed, where it is necessary to consider the safety of the mother as well as the fetus. We report the case of a 30-week pregnant patient who was surgically treated for acute appendicitis in pregnancy with an open appendectomy approach. Postoperative complications resulted in wound dehiscence with complete defect in fascia, which was treated with negative V.A.C. ATS® Therapy System. The therapy was started in the 30th week of pregnancy and continued until delivery with regular check-ups and regular redressing of the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system. At 38 weeks of pregnancy, the patient delivered vaginally with continued VAC therapy in situ. The final suture took place 3 days after vaginal delivery. Non-healing wounds with abdominal wall defects should be treated using a multidisciplinary approach, and NPWT can be used. This therapy can also be used during pregnancy. Vaginal delivery is preferred because it reduces the risk of further formation or deepening of the abdominal wall defect after a sufficient time interval from the start of the treatment. This complex case with a literature review of surgical complications in pregnancy treated with NPWT therapy highlights the advantage of a multidisciplinary approach.

Indexed as

AppendectomyNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyPregnancy ComplicationsSurgical Wound DehiscenceAdultAppendicitisDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPregnancyappendicitisnegative pressure wound therapyobstetricspregnancysurgical site infectionvacuum‐assisted closure systemwound dehiscence

Identifiers

PMID39825682
PMCPMC12177310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.