ArticleMolecular oncology2025
Consensus molecular subtyping of colorectal carcinoma brain metastases reveals a metabolic signature associated with poor patient survival.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic reprogramming in colorectal cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic insights.Genes & diseases · 2027Review
- LINC01614 favors breast cancer progression through the regulation of miR-217/FN1 and mediation in PI3K/AKT signal pathway.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Colorectal cancer metastasis to the brain: A scoping review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025Article
- The Emerging Oncogenic Role of RARγ: From Stem Cell Regulation to a Potential Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transcriptomic classification of primary colorectal cancer (CRC) into distinct consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) is a well-described strategy for patient stratification. However, the molecular nature of CRC metastases remains poorly investigated. To this end, this study aimed to identify and compare organotropic CMS frequencies in CRC liver and brain metastases. Compared to reported CMS frequencies in primary CRC, liver metastases from CRC patients were CMS4-enriched and CMS3-depleted, whereas brain metastases mainly clustered as CMS3 and rarely as CMS4. Regarding overall survival rates, CMS4 was the most favorable subtype for patients with hepatic lesions, followed by CMS1 and CMS2. The survival of patients with brain metastases did not correlate with CMS. However, we identified a CMS3-related metabolic gene signature, specifically upregulated in central nervous system (CNS)-infiltrating CRC, as a negative prognostic marker and potential tumor progressor. In summary, subtyping of CRC metastases revealed an organotropic CMS distribution in liver and brain with impact on patient survival. CNS-infiltrating CRC samples were enriched for CMS3 and predictive metabolic biomarkers, suggesting metabolic dysregulation of CRC cells as a prerequisite for metastatic colonization of the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.