ArticleCancer medicine2025
Impact of Centralisation of Radical Prostatectomy Driven by the Introduction of Robotic Systems on Positive Surgical Margin and Biochemical Recurrence in pT2 Prostate Cancer.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo assess how centralisation of cancer services via robotic surgery influenced positive surgical margin (PSM) occurrence and its associated risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in cases of pT2 prostate cancer (PC).
methodsRetrospective analysis of all radical prostatectomy (RP) cases performed in the West of Scotland during the period from January 2013 to June 2022. Primary outcomes were PSM and BCR. The secondary outcomes compared the impact of centralisation and surgical approach on PSM and BCR; and margin length and location on BCR. Propensity score matching and Cox regression models were performed using R.
resultsA total of, 907 patients were included; 662 robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), 245 open RP. PSM rate was 17.7% (161/907), similar in RARP and open cohorts. Patients with PSM had higher rates of BCR; 26.7%, compared to 8.7% in patients with no PSM. Patients with margins of ≥ 1 mm had higher risk of developing BCR. Patients who underwent open RP had increased incidence of PSM ≥ 1 mm; 40/43 (93%) compared to 83/117 (71%) in robotic approach (p = 0.003). Limitations include the study being retrospective, introduction of centralisation and robot concurrently, and evolution of practice. DISCUSSION: PSMs in pT2 PC are associated with higher rates of BCR. Introduction of centralisation via the robot had no impact on PSM occurrence or BCR, although did demonstrate a reduction in PSM length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.