Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825461›Full record

ArticleCardio-oncology (London, England)2025

Nursing knowledge in cardio-oncology: results of an international learning needs-assessment survey.

Anecita Fadol, Geraldine Lee, Valerie Shelton, Kelly C Schadler, Asma Mohammed Younus, Mary Stuart, Lisa Nodzon, Edith Pituskin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Developing a cardio-oncology education programme for nurses.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The Current Cardio-Oncology Landscape Across Australia.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Contemporary management of atrial fibrillation in patients with cancer-the 2025 European Heart Rhythm Association survey.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anecita FadolDepartments of Nursing and Cardiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, FC2.2018, Unit 0456, 77030-4009, Houston, TX, USA. afadol@mdanderson.org.
Geraldine LeeCatherine McAuley School of Nursing & Midwifery, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex University College Cork, Cork, T12 AK54, Ireland.
Valerie SheltonDepartment of Nursing, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 0456, 77030-1407, Houston, TX, USA.
Kelly C SchadlerLehigh Valley Health Network, LVPG Cardiology Heart and Vascular Institute, 2649 Schoenersville Rd, 18017, Bethlehem, Pa, USA.
Asma Mohammed YounusCardio-Oncology, Hamad Medical Corporation, P.O.Box 3050, Doha, Qatar.
Mary StuartAYA Program, IWK Health Centre, University Avenue, PO Box 9700, Halifax, NS, 5850/5980, B3K 6R8, Canada.
Lisa NodzonDepartment of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Edith PituskinDept of Oncology Tier 2 Canada Research Chair, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith early detection and improvements in systemic and local therapies, millions of people are surviving cancer, but for some at a high cost. In some cancer types, cardiovascular disease now competes with recurrent cancer as the cause of death. Traditional care models, in which the cardiologist or oncologist assess patients individually, do not address complex cancer and cardiovascular needs. Nursing disciplines should be an integral part of holistic assessment in cardio-oncology care. To learn what educational needs nurses perceive important for provision of competent cardio-oncology nursing care, we undertook an international survey, aiming to understand their learning needs and preferred learning modalities.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was developed by members of the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS) Nursing Research group. The survey was in English and consisted of 23 questions which include demographic information, clinical specialty (oncology, cardiology, or cardio-oncology), multiple-choice questions related to clinical topics that nurses might be interested in learning, and preferred methods of instruction.

resultsThree hundred and twenty-nine responses were received. The majority expressed interest in learning more about cardio-oncology related topics, primarily via pre-recorded webinars (n = 206, 67%) and live virtual meetings (n = 192, 63%). Formal programs leading to certification were highly endorsed (n = 247, 80%). In relation to specific cardio-oncology topics, there was a strong interest in learning more about specific cardiovascular toxicities, and their monitoring and management (n = 205, 66%).

conclusionCardio-oncology is a new field of expertise requiring competent nurses with current knowledge incorporating both specialties. The survey we conducted described the sample's characteristics, identified cardio-oncology learning needs and preferred methods of delivery. A cardio-oncology core curriculum based on the survey responses can offer convenient, accessible and learner-directed education for nurses worldwide. Ultimately, development of cardio-oncology nursing expertise will benefit cancer patients and survivors worldwide.

Indexed as

CardiologyCardio-oncologyCertificationEducationLearning needs assessmentMultidisciplinary teamNursingOncologySurveyWebinar

Identifiers

PMID39825461
PMCPMC11740670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.