ReviewThrombosis journal2025
Catheter-directed therapy for pulmonary embolism in pediatrics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Thrombosis journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in treatment and prevention of pulmonary thromboembolism associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children.Pediatric research · 2026Review
- Vascular and Non-Vascular Intervention in the Pediatric Chest: An Update.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious and potentially fatal condition that is relatively rare in the pediatric population. In patients presenting with massive/submassive PE, catheter-directed Therapy (CDT) presents an emerging therapeutic modality by which PE can be managed.
methodsElectronic databases were systematically searched through May 2024. This systematic review was performed in line with recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (Reg. no. CRD42024534229).
resultsSixteen case reports/series were included in the quantitative analysis with a total population of 40 children diagnosed with PE. Of them, 21 were females and 19 were males. Massive PE was diagnosed in 15 patients and submassive PE was diagnosed in 17 patients. Complete resolution of PE happened at a rate of 68% (95%CI = 46-80%). Mortality was encountered at a rate of 18% (95%CI = 0.7-36%). PE recurred after CDT at a rate of 15% (95%CI = 2-28%). Non-major bleeding complicated CDT at a rate of 46% (95%CI = 25-66%, p = 0.163).
conclusionCDT can be utilized in the management of PE in children as a potential therapeutic option for selected patients. While the results of CDT interventions for pediatric PE are promising, further research -including well-conducted cohort studies- is required to validate those results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.