ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2025
Comparative In vitro antibacterial activity of nemonoxacin and other fluoroquinolones in correlation with resistant mechanisms in contemporary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus blood isolates in Taiwan.
Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Approaching Imidazoles as Insecticidal Agents: Design, Synthesis, Toxicological, Biochemical, and Biological Effectiveness.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- The latest research progress on the clinical application of nemonoxacin.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNemonoxacin is a new quinolone with an antibacterial efficacy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Certain sequence types (STs) have been emerging in Taiwan, including fluoroquinolone-resistant ST8/USA300. It's an urgent need to determine nemonoxacin susceptibility against ST8/USA300 and other emerging lineages, if any. Additionally, molecular characterization of nemonoxacin resistance among different lineages has yet to be defined.
methodsNon-duplicated MRSA blood isolates from five hospitals during 2019-2020 were collected and genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and further correlated to their STs. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for all antibiotics was performing by using Sensititre standard panel, except nemonoxacin by using agar dilution method. Selected isolates with nemonoxacin MICs ≥ 0.5 mg/mL were sequenced for quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs).
resultsOverall, 915 MRSA isolates belonged to four major lineages, ST8 (34.2%), ST59 (23.5%), ST239 (13.9%), and clonal complex 45 (13.7%). Two-thirds of tested isolates were non-susceptible to moxifloxacin, especially ST8/USA300 and ST239. Of them, proportions of nemonoxacin non-susceptibility by a tentative clinical breakpoint (tCBP) of 1 µg/mL among four major lineages appeared to be different (P = 0.06) and highest in ST239 (22.2%), followed by ST8/USA300 (13.5%). Among 89 isolates sequenced, 44.1% of ST8 and all ST239 isolates had ≥ 3 amino acid substitutions (AAS) in gyrA/parC (group A) or 2 AAS in gyrA/parC with additional AAS in gyrB/parE (group B). Compared to other AAS patterns, isolates in group A had the greatest non-susceptible proportions to nemonoxacin (86.9%; overall/pair-wised comparisons, P < 0.05).
conclusionsOur study confirmed ST8/USA300 MRSA has disseminated in Taiwan. Using a tCBP defined by a higher parenteral daily dosage, nemonoxacin retained potency against moxifloxacin non-susceptible isolates. Patterns of AAS in QRDRs among different lineages may contribute to difference of nemonoxacin susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.