Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825361›Full record

SynthesisJournal of translational medicine2025

KEAP1 mutations as key crucial prognostic biomarkers for resistance to KRAS-G12C inhibitors.

Linyan Tian, Chengming Liu, Sufei Zheng, Huiyang Shi, Fang Wei, Wenxin Jiang, Yucheng Dong, Haiyan Xu, Enzhi Yin, Nan Sun and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. KRAS Inhibition in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Linyan Tian *Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Chengming Liu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Sufei ZhengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Huiyang ShiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Fang WeiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Wenxin JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yucheng DongDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Haiyan XuDepartment of Comprehensive Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Enzhi YinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Nan SunDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Jie HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China. wangyanyifu@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1743-6383

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKRAS-G12C inhibitors mark a notable advancement in targeted cancer therapies, yet identifying predictive biomarkers for treatment efficacy and resistance remains essential for optimizing clinical outcomes.

methodsThis systematic meta-analysis synthesized studies available through September 2024 across PubMed, Cochrane Library, SpringerLink, and Embase. Using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, this study generated cells with KEAP1 and STK11 knockouts, and utilized lentiviral vectors to overexpress PD-L1. Cellular sensitivity to KRAS-G12C inhibitors-AMG510, MRTX849, and JAB-21822-was evaluated through CCK-8 assays. Comprehensive bioinformatics analyses on stably transfected cell lines were conducted to elucidate pathways mediating resistance.

resultsAnalysis of 13 studies involving 1132 patients highlighted the significant efficacy of KRAS-G12C inhibitor monotherapy, particularly among elderly and female patients. Treatment response was notably affected by liver and brain metastases, with KEAP1 mutations identified as a primary negative prognostic factor, closely associated with early resistance to treatment. Validation studies in NCI-H358 cells showed a marked increase in IC50 values for AMG510, MRTX849, and JAB-21822 after KEAP1 knockout (P < 0.0001), with IC50 values rising from 27.78 nm, 116.9 nm, and 118.7 nm in controls, respectively. Comparative analysis of differentially expressed genes in KEAP1 knockout cells versus controls, utilizing GO, KEGG, and Reactome pathway analyses, revealed substantial enrichment in pathways linked to extracellular matrix organization and cell adhesion processes. Although STK11 mutations and heightened PD-L1 expression indicated a trend toward poorer outcomes, these correlations lacked statistical significance.

conclusionThis research affirms KRAS-G12C inhibitors as promising treatments, especially for certain patient subgroups, and underscores KEAP1 mutations as key biomarkers for resistance. The findings highlight the urgent need for alternative therapeutic approaches in KEAP1-mutant patients and emphasize the role of molecular profiling in tailored treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmKelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1MutationProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Cell Line, TumorFemaleHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorKEAP1 protein, humanKelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1KRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)BiomarkersDrug resistanceKEAP1 mutationsKRAS-G12C inhibitorsTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID39825361
PMCPMC11748609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.