Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825353›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Mitigating bias in AI mortality predictions for minority populations: a transfer learning approach.

Tianshu Gu, Wensen Pan, Jing Yu, Guang Ji, Xia Meng, Yongjun Wang, Minghui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tianshu GuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Wensen PanDepartment of Respiration and Intensive Care, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jing YuDepartment of Respiration and Intensive Care, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Guang JiDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Xia MengDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China.
Minghui LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. mli54@uthsc.edu.

Funding

Policy Pathways to Breast Health Equity in Racially Segregated Areas with Concentrated PovertyR01MD018766 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI Shelley White-Means · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD018766NIMHD NIH HHS R01MD018766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the crucial role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting mortality and guiding healthcare decisions. However, AI models may perpetuate or exacerbate existing health disparities due to demographic biases, particularly affecting racial and ethnic minorities. The objective of this study is to investigate the demographic biases in AI models predicting COVID-19 mortality and to assess the effectiveness of transfer learning in improving model fairness across diverse demographic groups.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used a population-based dataset of COVID-19 cases from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), spanning the years 2020-2024. The study analyzed AI model performance across different racial and ethnic groups and employed transfer learning techniques to improve model fairness by adapting pre-trained models to the specific demographic and clinical characteristics of the population.

resultsDecision Tree (DT) and Random Forest (RF) models consistently showed improvements in accuracy, precision, and ROC-AUC scores for Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic/Latino, and Asian populations. The most significant precision improvement was observed in the DT model for Hispanic/Latino individuals, which increased from 0.3805 to 0.5265. The precision for Asians or Pacific Islanders in the DT model increased from 0.4727 to 0.6071, and for Non-Hispanic Blacks, it rose from 0.5492 to 0.6657. Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) produced mixed results, showing accuracy and precision improvements for Non-Hispanic Black and Asian groups, but declines for the Hispanic/Latino and American Indian groups, with the most significant decline in precision, which dropped from 0.4612 to 0.2406 in the American Indian group. Logistic Regression (LR) demonstrated minimal changes across all metrics and groups. For the Non-Hispanic American Indian group, most models showed limited benefits, with several performance metrics either remaining stable or declining.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of AI in predicting COVID-19 mortality while also underscoring the critical need to address demographic biases. The application of transfer learning significantly improved the predictive performance of models across various racial and ethnic groups, suggesting these techniques are effective in mitigating biases and promoting fairness in AI models.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19Machine LearningMinority GroupsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesArtificial intelligenceCOVID-19Demographic biasHealth disparitiesMortality predictionTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39825353
PMCPMC11742213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.