Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825349›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Revamping field practicum: insights for future health services management professionals.

Fatemeh Mohabati, Marzieh Arefi, Seyed Pouria Hedayati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fatemeh MohabatiDepartment of Healthcare Services Management, School of Health, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran.
Marzieh ArefiDepartment of Healthcare Services Management, School of Health, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran.
Seyed Pouria HedayatiDepartment of Healthcare Services Management, School of Health, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran. pouria2005@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effectiveness of Health Services Management curricula relies heavily on practical experiences that reflect the evolving needs of the healthcare sector. This study focuses on revising Field Practicum 4 for undergraduate students to better prepare them for leadership roles in healthcare.

methodsThis qualitative and cross-sectional case study was conducted during the 2022-2023 academic year at Zabol University of Medical Sciences. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews and document analysis of the undergraduate curriculum. Purposeful sampling was used to select a diverse group of interviewees, including faculty members, healthcare managers, graduates, and current students, with a total of 38 interviews conducted until data saturation was reached. Thematic analysis was performed using MAXQDA software version 11. The CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model was applied to systematically assess and enhance the practicum program.For the quantitative data analysis, SPSS version 23 was utilized.

resultsThe central finding from this study was the enhancement of productivity in Field Practicum 4. Thirteen core issues were identified and categorized into primary codes, including causal, contextual, intervening, focal, strategies, and outcomes. To achieve desirable outcomes through a fundamental revision strategy, it was decided that, in addition to students' presence in hospitals (including the office of senior hospital managers and the quality improvement and accreditation unit), students should also be present in the deputyships and central units of Zabol University of Medical Sciences (treatment, resource development and management, food and drug administration, and the center for management of medical emergencies). Furthermore, students should engage with the county health insurance organization and a private insurance company to gain comprehensive familiarity with their operations. The level of consensus among the faculty members of the Health Services Management Department was at least 90%. The findings indicate that both students and internship supervisors generally rated the program positively (Mean > 4.5), although areas for improvement are highlighted, particularly in aspects of process and product.

conclusionsThe study concludes that revising Field Practicum 4 using the CIPP model provides a structured approach to enhancing practical training for Health Services Management students. Implementing these modifications in the apprenticeship syllabus is expected to improve the capabilities of graduates, better preparing them to meet the needs of healthcare system.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHealth Services AdministrationLeadershipCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchCIPP ModelField PracticumHealth Services ManagementRevision

Identifiers

PMID39825349
PMCPMC11740450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.