Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825318›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025

Is the convergence insufficiency symptom survey applicable to elderly individuals?

Saeid Abdi, Haleh Kangari, Saeed Rahmani, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Zahra Kamary Rad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saeid AbdiDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-2952
Haleh KangariDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. halehkangari@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-9574
Saeed RahmaniDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-4405
Alireza Akbarzadeh BaghbanProteomics Research Center, Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0961-1874
Zahra Kamary RadDepartment of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-2803

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe psychometric properties of the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) have been previously determined across the younger adult population. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the CISS in presbyopic adults via classical and Rasch analysis.

methodsA total of 100 presbyopic individuals (40-60 years) were selected with far and near acuity of 20/20 with their habitual spectacles; 50 had convergence insufficiency and 50 had normal binocular vision. Refraction, cover test, near point of convergence, and positive fusional ranges were examined. The Persian translated CISS was administered twice, once in the first session and 7 to 14 days later. Classical and Rasch analyses were conducted.

resultsThe mean ages and gender ratios in the CI group and normal group were 49.70 ± 5.96 and 49.82 ± 5.64 years with a 50% female distribution among individuals. The mean CISS scores for presbyopes with CI and normal groups were 19.24 ± 5.33 and 13.26 ± 3.53 respectively (p < 0.001). Effective discrimination was achieved with a score greater than 15, yielding a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 69%, and an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.813. For internal consistency, Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.82. For test-retest reliability in CISS scores, ICC was 0.91 (confidence interval 0.88-0.93) with the 95% limits of agreement in CI group being - 3.91 to 2.59. The Rasch analysis demonstrated a satisfactory model fit, as all items had infit and outfit mean square values ranging between 0.6 and 1.4. The measurement precision was good, with a person separation value of 2.30. Additionally, the first contrast eigenvalue of 2.34 and a raw variance of less than 50% indicated multidimensionality. The CI group reported headaches (item 3) more frequently than the normal binocular vision group did. However, eye discomfort scores (item 10) were similar for both groups.

conclusionsThe CISS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the symptoms in presbyopic adults. However, due to this survey's multidimensionality, we recommend additional objective examinations in presbyopic adults with CI.

Indexed as

Convergence, OcularOcular Motility DisordersPresbyopiaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesVision, BinocularVisual AcuityConvergence insufficiencyConvergence insufficiency symptom surveyPresbyopia

Identifiers

PMID39825318
PMCPMC11742225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.