ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
A quality improvement initiative to improve growth monitoring of children attending immunization clinic in an urban primary health centre in Delhi.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving vaccination coverage among 24-month-old children in the ASL Napoli 3 Sud: a M.A.S.T.E.R. approach to transformation, evaluation and strategic redesign.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Quality improvement initiatives in maternal, infant, young child, and adolescent nutrition (MIYCAN) in India: A scoping review.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmunization clinics present an opportunity for passive screening for malnutrition among young children through plotting of growth charts. Passive screening for malnutrition can enable timely interventions and improve morbidity and mortality of under-five children. Therefore, we aimed to increase the plotting of growth charts (weight-for-age) to 90%, among under-five children attending immunization clinics in an Urban Health Centre (UHC) in south Delhi over three months. METHODOLOGY: A Quality Improvement (QI) initiative was undertaken in the immunization clinic of an urban primary health centre in southern Delhi, from January to March 2024. A multi-faceted QI team was formed. The baseline coverage of weight-for-age growth chart plotting in the immunization clinic was 31%. The process flow was mapped, and critical gaps identified by root cause analysis (Fish Bone technique). Change ideas were discussed and prioritized using a prioritization matrix to implement these through sequential PDSA cycles. The main change ideas implemented were training of health workers, allotting regular supervisors for the session, and appending a stamp for quick identification of underweight children. Run chart was used to assess the changes over time. We considered the outcome achieved if the plotting coverage was more than 90% sustained for at least six consecutive immunization sessions.
resultsMultiple change ideas were implemented over a period of three months. The coverage of growth chart plotting increased to more than 90%. Lack of motivation among stakeholders was a challenge for some change ideas. Monitoring of immunization sessions for plotting of growth chart was continued post the implementation of all change ideas to assess sustainability which showed positive results. Post-implementation of the change ideas, a meeting was held with the members of the QI team to get feedback on this activity.
conclusionThere is potential for improving growth monitoring at immunization clinics, which can be beneficial in strengthening passive screening for malnutrition in primary care settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.