Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825286›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Billing models for measuring nursing care in inpatient and outpatient settings: a scoping review.

Marco Di Nitto, Francesca Napolitano, Michela Calzolari, Yari Longobucco, Vittorio Masotta, Francesco Zaghini, Rosaria Alvaro, Giancarlo Cicolini, Loreto Lancia, Duilio Fiorenzo Manara and 6 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Marco Di NittoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via A. Pastore 1, Genoa, 16132, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-622X
Francesca NapolitanoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via A. Pastore 1, Genoa, 16132, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9204-0899
Michela CalzolariDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via A. Pastore 1, Genoa, 16132, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8553-8330
Yari LongobuccoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni, 48, Florence, 50143, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2703-9349
Vittorio MasottaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, Coppito, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-371X
Francesco ZaghiniDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier, 1, Rome, 00133, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-5751
Rosaria AlvaroDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier, 1, Rome, 00133, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4659-1569
Giancarlo CicoliniDepartment of innovative technologies in medicine & dentistry, "G. D'annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, 66100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2736-1792
Loreto LanciaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, Piazzale Salvatore Tommasi 1, Coppito, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2345-1731
Duilio Fiorenzo ManaraFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina, 58, Milan, 20132, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5182-6994
Laura RaseroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni, 48, Florence, 50143, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4460-8002
Gennaro RoccoCentre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, c/o Order of Nursing Professions (OPI) of Rome, Viale degli Ammiragli, 67 sc. B, Rome, 00146, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9211-3752
Maurizio ZegaFatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, A.Gemelli IRCCS University Hospital Foundation, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, Rome, 00168, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7821-2615
Beatrice MazzoleniHumanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Milan, Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Italy. beatrice.mazzoleni@hunimed.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3870-1238
Loredana SassoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via A. Pastore 1, Genoa, 16132, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-5937
Annamaria BagnascoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Via A. Pastore 1, Genoa, 16132, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9079-8460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rising cost of healthcare is a concerning issue for healthcare systems. The Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) system lacks direct consideration for costs related to nursing care. Therefore, to date there is no clear picture of billing models that consider also nursing activity when evaluating healthcare service costs or what factors related to nursing care affect the costs of healthcare services and would therefore need to be considered in billing models.

methodsA scoping review was conducted. We searched articles published from January 2000 to September 2023, in English, Italian and Spanish. We consulted MEDLINE (Pubmed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science (Clarivate), SCOPUS (Elsevier), ProQuest and Google Scholar, government sites and major international bodies (e.g., National Health Service NHS, World Health Organization WHO).

resultsWe included a total of 31 studies. The results highlighted 3 categories of factors related to nursing costs, which involve the organisation (e.g., nurse-to-patient ratio), nurses (e.g., skill mix, interventions), and patients (e.g., patient complexity, patient outcomes). All the billing models reported in the literature considered one or more of these categories to estimate nursing costs. The results also showed that appropriate management of organisational and nursing factors, such as staffing and skill mix, could improve healthcare service costs, nursing care or practice, and patient outcomes.

conclusionsThis study sheds light on the multifaceted aspects of nursing care that should be considered in a specific, comprehensive, billing model. Additional testing of existing models to verify their effectiveness, as well as the organisation of a permanent committee (or Task Force) that develops a comprehensive billing model, are necessary to guide the formulation of new policies.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareNursing CareDiagnosis-Related GroupsHumansHealth care serviceNursing billing modelsNursing costsNursing economic evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39825286
PMCPMC11740332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.