Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825254›Full record

Observational studyBMC public health2025

Are psychological attitudes towards vaccination an expression of personality? A cross-sectional study on COVID-19 vaccination in France.

Gaëlle Lièvre, Jonathan Sicsic, Simon Galmiche, Tiffany Charmet, Arnaud Fontanet, Judith Mueller

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04607941 (Study of Socio-demographic Factors, Behaviors and Practices Associated With Infection With SARS-CoV-2), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04607941 completednot on this map

Study of Socio-demographic Factors, Behaviors and Practices Associated With Infection With SARS-CoV-2

TypeobservationalSponsorInstitut PasteurRan2020 to 2022Enrolled766,818ConditionsCovid19ArmsQuestionnaires, Phone interviews
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gaëlle LièvreEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 Rue du Docteur Roux, Bâtiment Laveran, Paris, 75015, France.
Jonathan SicsicUniversité de Paris, IUT de Paris, Rives de Seine, 143 Avenue de Versailles, Paris, 75016, France.
Simon GalmicheEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 Rue du Docteur Roux, Bâtiment Laveran, Paris, 75015, France.
Tiffany CharmetEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 Rue du Docteur Roux, Bâtiment Laveran, Paris, 75015, France.
Arnaud FontanetEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 Rue du Docteur Roux, Bâtiment Laveran, Paris, 75015, France.
Judith MuellerEmerging Diseases Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 25-28 Rue du Docteur Roux, Bâtiment Laveran, Paris, 75015, France. judith.mueller@ehesp.fr.

Funding

INCEPTION project PIA/ANR-16-CONV-0005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe capacity of the 7C model's psychological antecedents, which include confidence in vaccines, complacency, convenience, calculation, collective responsibility, confidence in the wider system, and social conformism, to explain variance in COVID-19 vaccine intentions and behaviours has been documented. However, it remains unclear whether the attitudes represented by the 7C psychological antecedents are specific to vaccination or if they are, in fact, an expression of underlying personality traits.

methodsFrom February to June 2022, French adults completed self-administered questionnaires assessing COVID-19 vaccination history, the 7C antecedents, and personality traits ("ComCor" and "Cognitiv" studies). Vaccination behaviours were studied through three outcomes: at-least-one-dose vaccination status by 2022 (N = 49,019), up-to-date vaccination status (N = 46,566), and uptake speed of first dose (N = 25,998). Personality traits were evaluated using the French version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-Fr). Multivariable logistic regressions and Cox models predicting vaccine behaviours were run with the 7C antecedents, both with and without personality traits.

resultsAmong the 49,019 participants, 95.0% reported receipt of at least one dose and 89.8% were up to date with recommendations. All 7C antecedents were significantly associated with the outcomes. The inclusion of personality traits did not substantially alter the effect estimates of the association between the 7C antecedents and vaccination behaviours, with differences between effect sizes of models with and without personality traits being < 5%.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the 7C psychological antecedents of vaccination are not the mere expression of personality and that their impact on vaccine behaviours is independent of personality traits. As such, the 7C antecedents may be modifiable by appropriate information and vaccine promotion.

trial registrationThe "ComCor" study received ethical approval by the Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Ouest et Outre Mer 1 on 21/09/2020. The addition of the "Cognitiv" questionnaire received ethical approval by the Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud Ouest et Outre Mer 1 on 01/02/2022. The data protection authority Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés (CNIL) authorised the processing of data on 21/10/2020. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04607941.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPersonalityVaccinationAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCOVID-19 Vaccines7C antecedentsHealth behaviorPersonalityPsychological attitudesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39825254
PMCPMC11742204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.