Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825237›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Development of a clinical prediction model for benign and malignant pulmonary nodules with a CTR ≥ 50% utilizing artificial intelligence-driven radiomics analysis.

Wensong Shi, Yuzhui Hu, Guotao Chang, He Qian, Yulun Yang, Yinsen Song, Zhengpan Wei, Liang Gao, Hang Yi, Sikai Wu and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk prediction of non-small cell lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules: a single-center cohort study based on six machine learning algorithms.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Wensong Shi *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Henan, University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou People's Hospital), Zhengzhou, 450003, China.
Yuzhui Hu *Department of Geratology, Ninth People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, 450053, China.
Guotao ChangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Henan, University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou People's Hospital), Zhengzhou, 450003, China.
He QianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Henan, University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou People's Hospital), Zhengzhou, 450003, China.
Yulun YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Henan, University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou People's Hospital), Zhengzhou, 450003, China.
Yinsen SongTranslational Medicine Research Center (Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation of Henan Province), The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou People's Hospital), Zhengzhou, China.
Zhengpan WeiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Liang GaoDepartment of Radiology, Ninth People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, 450053, China.
Hang YiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Sikai WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Kun WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Huandong HuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Shuaibo WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yousheng MaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Siyuan AiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Liangxiang Hospital, Beijing, 102401, Fangshan District, China.
Liang ZhaoShukun (Beijing) Technology Co, Beijing, 100102, China.
Xiangnan LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
Huiyu ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Henan, University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou People's Hospital), Zhengzhou, 450003, China. huiyu88@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn clinical practice, diagnosing the benignity and malignancy of solid-component-predominant pulmonary nodules is challenging, especially when 3D consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) ≥ 50%, as malignant ones are more invasive. This study aims to develop and validate an AI-driven radiomics prediction model for such nodules to enhance diagnostic accuracy.

methodsData of 2,591 pulmonary nodules from five medical centers (Zhengzhou People's Hospital, etc.) were collected. Applying exclusion criteria, 370 nodules (78 benign, 292 malignant) with 3D CTR ≥ 50% were selected and randomly split 7:3 into training and validation cohorts. Using R programming, Lasso regression with 10-fold cross-validation filtered features, followed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression to construct the model. Its efficacy was evaluated by ROC, DCA curves and calibration plots.

resultsLasso regression picked 18 non-zero coefficients from 108 features. Three significant factors-patient age, solid component volume and mean CT value-were identified. The logistic regression equation was formulated. In the training set, the ROC AUC was 0.721 (95%CI: 0.642-0.801); in the validation set, AUC was 0.757 (95%CI: 0.632-0.881), showing the model's stability and predictive ability.

conclusionThe model has moderate accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant 3D CTR ≥ 50% nodules, holding clinical potential. Future efforts could explore more to improve its precision and value. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSolitary Pulmonary Nodule3D CTR ≥ 50%Artificial intelligenceBenign and malignantClinical prediction modelRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39825237
PMCPMC11742483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.