Observational studyBrain imaging and behavior2025
Abnormal sensory processing cortex in insomnia disorder: a degree centrality study.
Observational study in Brain imaging and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a nomogram for predicting the risk of potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: A retrospective cross-sectional study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Problematic Screen Exposure and Sleep Disturbances in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: The Mediating Role of Sensory Processing.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Subtyping insomnia disorder with a population graph attention autoencoder: revealing two distinct biotypes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing Sleep Science: A Narrative Review of the Historical Origins and Current Applications of Sleep Neuroimaging.Nature and science of sleep · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Insomnia disorder is a significant global health concern. This research aimed to explore the pathogenesis of insomnia disorder using static and dynamic degree centrality methods at the voxel level. A total of 29 patients diagnosed with insomnia disorder and 28 healthy controls were ultimately included to examine differences in degree centrality between the two groups. Additionally, the relationship between altered degree centrality values and various clinical indicators was analyzed. The results revealed that patients with insomnia disorder exhibited higher static degree centrality in brain regions associated with sensory processing, such as the occipital gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, and supramarginal gyrus. In contrast, lower static degree centrality was observed in the parahippocampal gyrus, amygdala, insula, and thalamus. Changes in dynamic degree centrality were identified in regions including the parahippocampal gyrus, anterior cingulum, medial superior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal gyrus, and precuneus. Notably, a negative correlation was found between dynamic degree centrality in the inferior parietal gyrus and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, while a positive correlation was observed between static degree centrality in the inferior temporal gyrus and the Hamilton Depression Scale. These findings suggest that dysfunction in centrality within the sensory processing cortex and subcortical nuclei may be associated with the sleep-wake imbalance in individuals with insomnia disorder, contributing to our understanding of hyperarousal mechanisms in insomnia. Moreover, the abnormalities observed in the default mode network and the salience network provide insights into understanding the neuropathogenesis of insomnia from both static and dynamic centrality perspectives. The clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2200058768. Date: 2022-04-16.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.