Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825155›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Predicting extubation failure in neonates: The role of lung ultrasound and corrected gestational age in safe weaning in the NICU.

Bruna Schafer Rojas, Renato Soibelmann Procianoy, Ana Carolina Menezes de Souza, Cristiane Cover Rigodanzo, Gabriela S Trindade, Silvana Piazza Furlan, Rita C Silveira

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bruna Schafer RojasHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Silva Jardim 1155 # 701, Porto Alegre, RS, 90450-071, Brazil.
Renato Soibelmann ProcianoyHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Silva Jardim 1155 # 701, Porto Alegre, RS, 90450-071, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Menezes de SouzaHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Silva Jardim 1155 # 701, Porto Alegre, RS, 90450-071, Brazil.
Cristiane Cover RigodanzoHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Silva Jardim 1155 # 701, Porto Alegre, RS, 90450-071, Brazil.
Gabriela S TrindadeHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Silva Jardim 1155 # 701, Porto Alegre, RS, 90450-071, Brazil.
Silvana Piazza FurlanHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Silva Jardim 1155 # 701, Porto Alegre, RS, 90450-071, Brazil.
Rita C SilveiraHospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Silva Jardim 1155 # 701, Porto Alegre, RS, 90450-071, Brazil. drarita.c.s@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-2652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of the lung ultrasound score (LUS) in predicting ventilatory weaning failure during neonatal hospitalization in the NICU and to identify factors associated with weaning failure, including corrected gestational age (CGA). This prospective, longitudinal, pragmatic and observational cohort study included neonates on mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h. The primary outcome was the accuracy of lung ultrasound in predicting 3-day weaning failure, with the ROC curve used to determine the best LUS cutoff (sensitivity and specificity). Among 55 neonates, the pre-extubation LUS did not show statistical significance in predicting weaning failure (AUC 0.61; 95% CI: 0.46-0.76, p = 0,169). In the subgroup analysis, a score ≥ 4 suggests the need for ventilatory support after extubation (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.80-1.0, p < 0.001) in neonates with GA ≥ 28 weeks. In extremely preterm infants, the pre-extubation LUS was not statistically significant in predicting weaning failure (AUC = 0.38, 95% CI: 0-0.77, p = 0.535). In contrast, CGA ≥ 28.7 weeks at extubation was predictor of successful weaning within 3 days (AUC = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.85-1.0, p < 0.001).

conclusionLUS show promise in predicting weaning failure, though its accuracy may be limited in extremely preterm infants, highlighting the need for further well-powered studies. CGA at extubation also emerges as a key consideration in this population, warranting confirmation through robust future research. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Identifying the optimal timing for extubation is crucial, as both prolonged mechanical ventilation and failed extubation are linked to increased morbidity. • Lung ultrasound plays a well-established role in diagnosing various neonatal lung pathologies, allowing clinicians to make rapid, bedside decisions for the treatment of newborns. WHAT IS NEW: • LUS appears to be accurate in predicting weaning failure, though its accuracy may be lower in extremely preterm infants. • In extremely preterm infants, CGA may play an important role in extubation decision-making. • These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant further investigation in future studies.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationGestational AgeLungVentilator WeaningFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLongitudinal StudiesMalePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialROC CurveUltrasonographyExtubationNeonatologyPoint of care ultrasoundUltrasoundVentilation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.