Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825145›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2025

Role of stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial epidermoid tumors: a systematic review to assess its safety, efficacy, and complication profile.

Onam Verma, Sandeep Mishra, Manjul Tripathi, Jason P Sheehan

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Onam Verma *Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Sandeep Mishra *All-India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Manjul TripathiGamma Knife Radiosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. drmanjultripathi@gmail.com.
Jason P SheehanUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven a gross total resection of a benign epidermoid tumor (ET) carries a high risk of recurrence. The management strategy mostly involves redo surgical excision but at a significant cost of morbidity and mortality. The role of adjuvant radiation therapies in this scenario is still undefined.

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficacy, and complication profile of radiosurgery as a standalone or adjuvant therapy for intracranial epidermoid in the published literature. METHODOLOGY: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of the databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science in published English language was conducted. We included studies with radiosurgery for benign ET and in patients with malignant transformation of ET (MTET). All studies were evaluated for tumor characteristics, pattern of treatment, dosimetric profile, outcome, and complications. We included all studies with at least one outcome of interest i.e. local control (LC); progression-free survival (PFS); symptomatic toxicity; disease progression; retreatment; and overall survival (OS); and cause-specific mortality.

resultsThe search revealed 403 articles, of which 6 and 8 studies with patients of benign ET and MTET respectively were included. 25 (65.7%) patients received primary SRS. 27 patients presented with hyperactive cranial nerve syndromes; 77.7% gained complete improvement. The overall median age was 46.7 years (22-67) and the median tumor volume ranged from 0.38 to 6.2cc in benign ET. Volumetric reduction was seen in 6 cases; progression was seen in 2 cases while ET remained stable in the rest. Mean follow-up duration ranged from 33.7 to 60 months, and no recurrence was reported at the latest follow-up in any case of benign ET. 9.5% of patients suffered from transient cranial nerve deficits with no prolonged adverse radiation effect. OS in the MTET group was 6 to 60 months following GKRS with 50% of patients alive at the latest follow-up.

conclusionSRS may be a promising treatment option for a conventionally benign and radioresistant ET making a meaningful change in the natural history of the disease. It is a valuable adjuvant technique in patients with MTET.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellRadiosurgeryHumansTreatment OutcomeCranial nerve dysfunctionEpidermoidGamma-knifeHemifacial spasmTrigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.