ArticleScientific reports2025
Pre-trained artificial intelligence-aided analysis of nanoparticles using the segment anything model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dissolution-redeposition dynamics as a universal restructuring mechanism of electrocatalysts.Chem circularity · 2026Review
- A deep learning method for nanoparticle size measurement in SEM images.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Assessing particle count in electron microscopy measurements of nanomaterials to support regulatory guidance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex structures can be understood as compositions of smaller, more basic elements. The characterization of these structures requires an analysis of their constituents and their spatial configuration. Examples can be found in systems as diverse as galaxies, alloys, living tissues, cells, and even nanoparticles. In the latter field, the most challenging examples are those of subdivided particles and particle-based materials, due to the close proximity of their constituents. The characterization of such nanostructured materials is typically conducted through the utilization of micrographs. Despite the importance of micrograph analysis, the extraction of quantitative data is often constrained. The presented effort demonstrates the morphological characterization of subdivided particles utilizing a pre-trained artificial intelligence model. The results are validated using three types of nanoparticles: nanospheres, dumbbells, and trimers. The automated segmentation of whole particles, as well as their individual subdivisions, is investigated using the Segment Anything Model, which is based on a pre-trained neural network. The subdivisions of the particles are organized into sets, which presents a novel approach in this field. These sets collate data derived from a large ensemble of specific particle domains indicating to which particle each subdomain belongs. The arrangement of subdivisions into sets to characterize complex nanoparticles expands the information gathered from microscopy analysis. The presented method, which employs a pre-trained deep learning model, outperforms traditional techniques by circumventing systemic errors and human bias. It can effectively automate the analysis of particles, thereby providing more accurate and efficient results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.