Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825076›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

YOLOSeg with applications to wafer die particle defect segmentation.

Yen-Ting Li, Yu-Cheng Chan, Chen-Che Huang, Yu-Chang Hsu, Ssu-Han Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yen-Ting LiCircle AI Incorporation, Taipei, 114, Taiwan.
Yu-Cheng ChanCenter for Artificial Intelligence & Data Science, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City, 243, Taiwan. chanyucheng@yahoo.com.
Chen-Che HuangCathay Financial Holdings Company Limited, Taipei, 106, Taiwan.
Yu-Chang HsuDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City, 243, Taiwan.
Ssu-Han ChenDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ming Chi University of Technology, New Taipei City, 243, Taiwan. ssuhanchen@mail.mcut.edu.tw.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 113-2221-E-131-031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study develops the you only look once segmentation (YOLOSeg), an end-to-end instance segmentation model, with applications to segment small particle defects embedded on a wafer die. YOLOSeg uses YOLOv5s as the basis and extends a UNet-like structure to form the segmentation head. YOLOSeg can predict not only bounding boxes of particle defects but also the corresponding bounding polygons. Furthermore, YOLOSeg also attempts to obtain a set of better weights by combining with several training tricks such as freezing layers, switching mask loss, using auto-anchor and introducing denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPM) image augmentation. The experiment results on the testing image set show that YOLOSeg's average precision (AP) and intersection over union (IoU) are as high as 0.821 and 0.732 respectively. Even when the sizes of particle defects are extremely small, the performance of YOLOSeg is far superior to current instance segmentation models such as mask R-CNN, YOLACT, YUSEG, and Ultralytics's YOLOv5s-segmentation. Additionally, preparing the training image set for YOLOSeg is time-saving because it needs neither to collect a large number of defective samples, nor to annotate pseudo defects, nor to design hand-craft features.

Indexed as

Auto-annotationDefect segmentationDenoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPM)Wafer dieYou only look once (YOLO)

Identifiers

PMID39825076
PMCPMC11742020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.