Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39825035›Full record

ArticleArchives of women's mental health2025

Integrated care for multi-domain vulnerability during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

Sushma C Munshi, Eline C I Hoex, Anne Marie Weggelaar-Jansen, Esther M Knijff, Eline C van der Wilk, Eric A P Steegers, Hilmar H Bijma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sushma C MunshiErasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands.
Eline C I HoexErasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands.
Anne Marie Weggelaar-JansenTranzo, Tilburg University, Reitse Poort 1, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Esther M KnijffDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands.
Eline C van der WilkErasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands.
Eric A P SteegersErasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands.
Hilmar H BijmaErasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, South Holland, The Netherlands. h.bijma@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

ZonMw 554001014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePsychosocial risk factors are frequently present in pregnant women and are associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Professional guidelines recommend early detection of vulnerability and provision of multidisciplinary care, including an integrated care plan for pregnant women with social factors, such as residing in deprived areas, teenage pregnancy, and psychiatric illness. However, to date, such approach is impeded by lack of data on co-occurrence of vulnerability. Therefore, we aim to describe co-occurrence of psychiatric illness, social factors or substance use during pregnancy.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of 1002 pregnant women referred for evaluation by a multidisciplinary team because of psychiatric illness, social factors or substance use in a university hospital in a large city in the Netherlands. Data from medical charts between January 2017 and May 2022 were extracted and analyzed by univariate and bivariate analysis.

resultsMulti-domain vulnerability was present in 83% of women and most frequently involved the following patterns: psychiatric illness with social factors and chronic physical illness (24%), psychiatric illness with social factors (14%), social factors with chronic physical illness (13%) and psychiatric illness with chronic physical illness (12%). Single-domain vulnerability was present in 17% of women, involving most frequently social factors (9%) and psychiatric illness (8%).

conclusionThe majority of women with psychiatric illness, social factors or substance use have multi-domain vulnerability. There is a need for a novel approach to care to address vulnerability in pregnant women.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedMental DisordersPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeopleSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansNetherlandsPregnancyPrenatal CareRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsYoung AdultComplex social factorsIntegrated approachIntellectual disabilityPsychiatric illnessPsychosocial careSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID39825035
PMCPMC12283844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.