ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2025
Morpho-physiological digestive features of genetically closely related sympatric lacustrine whitefish forms with different feeding habits.
Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Valorization of Mushroom By-Products FromAquaculture nutrition · 2026Article
- Developmental responses of sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) to temperature modulation with insights into intestinal and morphological traits.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effect of different feeding habits on gut morphology and digestive function has been intensively studied during the last decades but sympatric closely related fishes are relatively rare objects of such studies. In the present study, we have identified both morphological and physiological changes in the digestive system of a sympatric pair of whitefish represented by "normal" Coregonus lavaretus pidschian (benthivorous) and "dwarf" C. l. pravdinellus (planktivorous) forms. There were statistically significant differences in terms of histometric variables between segments of the stomach (height of lining epithelium, fold thickness and height values, and number of folds) and intestine (enterocyte height and fold height) within each form as well as between forms for the same segment of the digestive tract like in the stomach (height of lining epithelium and fold thickness) and intestine (enterocyte height, fold height and fold thickness). Both forms had a similar number (8-9 bands) and molecular weight of isoforms/isoenzymes of alkaline proteases inhibited by PMSF (serine proteases) based on zymogram analyses. The maximum level of activity of alkaline proteases, alkaline phosphatase, and aminopeptidase N were registered in the pyloric caeca for both forms. In contrast to these enzymes, the activity of α-amylase as well as of non-specific lipases and esterases in the pyloric caeca was similar or even lower if compared to other intestinal segments. In conclusion, both sympatric forms of whitefish showed some similarities in several of studied biochemical and histological parameters of their digestive tracts, regardless of their different feeding habits, which might be related to their genetical background.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39825033What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.