ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical feasibility of deep learning-driven magnetic resonance angiography collateral map in acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning in neuroradiology: Recent developments and applications.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To validate the clinical feasibility of deep learning-driven magnetic resonance angiography (DL-driven MRA) collateral map in acute ischemic stroke. We employed a 3D multitask regression and ordinal regression deep neural network, called as 3D-MROD-Net, to generate DL-driven MRA collateral maps. Two raters graded the collateral perfusion scores of both conventional and DL-driven MRA collateral maps and measured the grading time. They also qualitatively assessed the image quality of both collateral maps. Interrater and inter-method agreements for collateral perfusion grading between the two collateral maps were analyzed, along with a comparison of grading time and image quality. In the analysis of the 296 acute ischemic stroke patients, the inter-method agreement for collateral perfusion grading was almost perfect (κ = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95-0.98). Compared to conventional MRA collateral maps, the time taken for collateral perfusion grading on DL-driven MRA collateral maps was shorter (P < 0.001 for rater 1 and P = 0.003 for rater 2), and the image quality of the DL-driven MRA collateral maps was superior (P < 0.001 for rater 1 and P = 0.002 for rater 2). The DL-driven MRA collateral map demonstrates clinical feasibility for collateral perfusion grading in acute ischemic stroke, with the added benefits of reduced generation and interpretation time, along with improved image quality of the MRA collateral map.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.