Observational studyScientific reports2025
Clinical and laboratory characteristics of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a retrospective analysis of 36 case.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential diagnosis of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and early rectal cancer via endorectal ultrasound: a retrospective matched case-control study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Gender-based variations in clinical course, Endoscopic and histological findings of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome - Multicenter study from Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical, laboratory, and histological characteristics of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) and assess the outcomes associated with various management strategies. This retrospective observational study was conducted at Giresun Education and Research Hospital. This study included patients diagnosed with SRUS between January 2020 and January 2024. Demographic information, clinical presentation, primary diagnosis, and laboratory parameters were obtained from electronic medical records. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, and the chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. A total of 36 patients diagnosed with SRUS were included, with the majority being male (80.6%), and the mean age of participants was 75.6 years. Hematochezia was identified as the most common initial symptom (61.1%), followed by abdominal pain (16.7%) and constipation (11.1%). Laboratory findings revealed significant abnormalities, including mean hemoglobin levels of 10.0 ± 2.4 g/dL and mean CRP levels of 56.7 ± 65.4 mg/L. Histopathological analysis showed that 38.9% of patients had normal biopsy results, whereas inflammation and dysplasia were observed in 41.7% and 2.8% of cases, respectively. Additionally, a statistically significant difference in age was observed between the patients presenting with different initial symptoms (p = 0.028). The study also found that biopsy results varied significantly across symptom groups (p = 0.012), and although differences in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels across biopsy groups were noted, they were not statistically significant. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of SRUS, emphasizing the importance of detailed clinical and laboratory evaluation. Hematochezia emerged as the most prevalent symptom, and ulcerative colitis was identified as the primary diagnosis. Significant associations were observed between various clinical parameters and patient outcomes, highlighting the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in managing SRUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.