Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39824990›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord2025

The Sir Ludwig Guttmann lecture 2023: psychosocial factors and adjustment dynamics after spinal cord injury.

Ashley Craig

Abstract readLecture
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ashley CraigRehabilitation Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, The Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, NSW, Australia. a.craig@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7647-7604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designNarrative review

objectivesSir Ludwig Guttmann realised spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation should incorporate more than a biomedical approach if SCI patients were to adjust to their injury and achieve productive social re-integration. He introduced components into rehabilitation he believed would assist his patients build physical strength as well as psychological resilience that would help them re-engage with their communities. We pay tribute to Sir Ludwig by presenting research that has focussed on psychosocial factors that contribute to adjustment dynamics after SCI.

settingNot applicable.

methodsFive factors with a psychosocial source will be examined, featured in my research, namely psychological distress, cognitive impairment, pain catastrophizing, sleep disorder and fatigue. A multifactorial model of adjustment will be examined.

resultsEvidence shows these factors can be significant barriers to adjustment and reciprocally related to self-efficacy and life decisions. A theoretical rehabilitation framework/model is presented called the SCI Adjustment Model (SCIAM), that explains the process of adjustment dynamics. It describes how multifactorial factors contribute to adjustment in a non-linear process over time.

conclusionsKey clinical messages include: (i) adjustment dynamics will be enhanced if viewed through the lens of a multifactorial model that clarifies how multiple psychosocial factors can combine and act as barriers or facilitators to adjustment; (ii) judiciously using this information, assess and then strategize to reduce the influence of barriers or strengthen facilitators during SCI rehabilitation and beyond, and (iii) integrate psychosocial guidelines and a person-centred approach into SCI rehabilitation to achieve treatment goals.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalSpinal Cord InjuriesFatigueHumansReview Literature as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39824990
PMCPMC12003166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.